Arthur Curley

Arthur Curley
Born (1938-01-22)January 22, 1938
Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.
Died March 31, 1998(1998-03-31) (aged 60)
Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.
Alma mater Harvard University
Simmons College
Occupation Librarian

Arthur Curley (January 22, 1938 – March 31, 1998) was an American librarian. He was listed as one of the 100 most important library leaders of the 20th century by the journal American Libraries.[1]

Early life and education

Arthur Curley was born January 22, 1938, in Boston to Irish parents. His mother is credited with having high expectations for him and for correctly presuming that he would attend the prestigious Boston Latin secondary school.[2] Later, he studied political science at Harvard University, graduating in 1959 before earning his M.L.S. at Simmons College in 1962.[3]

Career

His first position in a library was at the Connolly branch of the Boston Public Library system in a so-called “pre-professional position” but by the time he had earned his library degree he was already appointed as the director of the Avon Public library where he worked from 1961 to 1964.[4] Though it was a directorship in title, he was the only employee of the library and was responsible for virtually every component of the library.[5]

In 1964, Curley was appointed as the director of the Palatine Public Library (Illinois), where he served from 1964 to 1969.[6]

Throughout his career he remained primarily in the Atlantic North East and Mid-West regions, typically taking positions as deputy director or director. Notably he “served as deputy director of the New York Public Library Research Libraries in 1980-1985 and deputy director of public services at Detroit Public Library from 1997 to 1980.”[7] His most notable career accomplishments include his election as President of the American Library Association in 1994 and his service as the director of the Boston Public Library from 1985 until 1996.[8]

His vision for the role of libraries in society

He was known to be politically astute and was tremendously concerned with how the function of the library as an institution was viewed by the public. Although he understood the important role of providing information he was emphatic that libraries needed to be seen first and foremost as “humanistic institutions”.[9] He saw libraries as embodying the best of America’s hopes and as the physical “repository of their values and aspirations”[10] for each and every community. As such, he believed that a strong commitment to collection building based on community needs was essential at every library and he was fiercely critical of “libraries [that] lowered their collection building sights in the name of resource-sharing or ‘access over ownership’”.

His belief in the power of libraries as valuable community institutions was enormous. During a speech he remarked,

I have always felt that I could go into any town, community, hamlet anywhere in this country, and if you blindfolded me so I didn’t know what community I was in, took me into the public library and suddenly took the blindfold off and let me look around for about ten minutes I think I could tell you more about the values of that community than I could derive from countless hours spent poring over census tracts and other sources of statistical information about it. Why? Because a library is a representative of intangible values and those intangible values more than ever are important to us as a society at this time..[11]

View of technology

Despite his love of the cultural aspects a library can provide he was in no way technophobic. He encouraged librarians to see their work and especially their role as a key part of the information revolution. Imploring his peers in 1994 at a symposium at Rutgers School of Communication, Information, and Library Studies he said, “We need to be people for whom this is one more technological development, like the telephone or the electric typewriter, which we view with optimism because it will help us to do our jobs."[12] However, he was particularly concerned with how this new technology and new forms of media could further divide populations based on class and other social factors depending on the relative levels of access. It was his belief that technological improvements should “arise from public commitment rather than fortuitous private philanthropy”.[13]

Lasting influence within the ALA

In addition to being widely regarded as one of the most eloquent library advocates, his energy and achievement for committee work within library organizations were enormous. When he became president of ALA in 1994 he ran on the theme “Libraries: An American Value” platform. Presently, he may be best known for the lecture series bearing his name, the Arthur Curley Memorial Lecture,[14] devoted to the same theme that takes place each mid-winter meeting.[15] He was a founding member of ALA’s Social Responsibility Round Table which exists to make the ALA more democratic and to equip librarians to help address social inequality and other human rights issues.[16] He was also chair of the Intellectual Freedom Committee from 1991 to 1994.[17] During his presidency he founded Library Advocacy Now, which has facilitated important training for library advocates. Rather than merely promoting best practices “for Curley, LAN represented the first step of a grassroots effort of the ALA’s ‘awaking to activism’.”[18] The rhetorical force of his visions for the role libraries can have in society continues to be important for many librarians and library advocates.

Notes

  1. ↑ Kniffel, Sullivan & McCormick 1999, p. 41
  2. ↑ Ring, 60
  3. ↑ Gale
  4. ↑ Ring, 60
  5. ↑ Ring, 60
  6. ↑ minutes of the Palatine Public Library Board, June 10, 1964
  7. ↑ ALA, 1998
  8. ↑ Long
  9. ↑ Curley, 67
  10. ↑ Curley, 65
  11. ↑ Curley, 65
  12. ↑ Curley, 68
  13. ↑ Ring, 61
  14. ↑ Arthur Curley Memorial Lecture, American Library Association, "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-02-22. Retrieved 2010-10-02. (retrieved May 2011)
  15. ↑ ALA, 1999
  16. ↑ 'Arthur Curley', in Librarian Leaders in Intellectual Freedom, (retrieved May 2011)
  17. ↑ Ring, 60
  18. ↑ Ring, 62

References

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/10/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.