Agena target vehicle

Agena Target Vehicle used on the Gemini 8 mission
Gemini 8 spacecraft about to dock with the Agena.
An Atlas-Agena launches with the Agena for Gemini 6 in which it fails

The Agena Target Vehicle (ATV) was an unmanned spacecraft used by NASA during its Gemini program to develop and practice orbital space rendezvous and docking techniques and to perform large orbital changes, in preparation for the Apollo program lunar missions.[1]

Operations

An Atlas launch vehicle launches GATV-5006 into orbit for the Gemini 11 mission.

Each ATV consisted of an Agena-D derivative upper rocket stage built by Lockheed and a docking adapter built by McDonnell. The Agena was launched from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Launch Complex 14 on top of an Atlas booster built by the Convair division of General Dynamics. The Agena first burn would occur shortly after shroud jettison and separation from the Atlas over the Atlantic Ocean. Over Ascension Island, a second burn would place the Agena into a low circular orbit.[1]

The McDonnell Gemini spacecraft would then be launched from Launch Complex 19, as soon as 90 minutes later. Both countdowns would proceed in parallel and required close synchronization. The Gemini would rendezvous and dock with the Agena as soon as Gemini's first orbit toward the end of the program.[1]

The Gemini astronauts would then fly the combined spacecraft in a stabilized mode and perform a number of experiments:

After the Gemini capsule separated for the last time, the Agena remained in orbit for a short time and was used to verify the command system.

The first Gemini-Agena Target Vehicle (GATV) was launched on October 25, 1965 while the Gemini 6 astronauts were waiting on the pad. While the Atlas performed normally, the Agena's engine exploded during orbital injection. Since the rendezvous and docking was the primary objective, the Gemini 6 mission was scrubbed, and replaced with the alternate mission Gemini 6A, which rendezvoused (but could not dock) with Gemini 7 in December.

An investigation into the failure concluded that it was most likely caused by design modifications to the GATV versus a standard Agena D stage. The Agena D was designed to have its engine restarted just once while the GATV would need to be restarted five times. While a standard Agena D pumped oxidizer into the combustion chamber first and then followed with the fuel, the GATV was modified to do the reverse because the normal start method had a tendency to leak oxidizer. While this would not be a problem for the Agena D with its single restart, the multi-restart GATV would eventually lose all of its oxidizer before the stage's operating life (which would last weeks instead of hours) could be completed. Unfortunately, pumping the fuel into the combustion chamber first caused the engine to backfire and rupture from mechanical shock. It was found out that Lockheed-Martin engineers did not properly test the GATV to root out this problem (it had been tested at a simulated altitude of 21 miles up when actual Agena engine start would occur at around 75 miles up). The solution to the problem was switching back to the normal oxidizer-first engine start and also testing the GATV in appropriate conditions. Bell Aerosystems, the manufacturer of the Agena's engine, were also instructed to perform further ground-level tests.

Augmented Target Docking Adapter

The ATDA in orbit as seen from Gemini 9A.

After the failure of the first GATV, McDonnell-Douglas developed a backup vehicle in case this situation should happen again. This was the Augmented Target Docking Adaptor, a dummy Agena stage with a docking collar, but no propulsion system. A few questions were raised about the compatibility of the ATDA with the Atlas booster, since it had much lower mass than the GATV, potentially throwing off the launch vehicle's aerodynamics and calibrated settings. However, Convair assured McDonnell-Douglas that it would pose no technical issues with the booster.

On May 17, 1966, Gemini 9 astronauts Tom Stafford and Eugene Cernan were sitting on the pad awaiting the launch of their GATV. But once again, things went awry. The Atlas lifted smoothly into a cloudy sky, vanishing from view around T+50 seconds. Shortly before Booster Engine Cutoff (BECO) was supposed to occur, the guidance control officer announced that he had lost contact with the booster. Telemetry indicated that vernier and sustainer cutoff occurred at T+300 seconds and Agena staging had taken place. The Agena continued transmitting signals until T+436 seconds, when all telemetry ceased.

Meanwhile, hidden behind cloud cover, the Atlas's right booster engine gimbaled hard to right at around T+120 seconds. The launch vehicle flipped 216 degrees around and began flying back towards Cape Canaveral, and in doing so had rotated into a position where it was impossible for ground guidance to lock on. Radar stations in the Bahamas indicated that it was heading north and descending. Atlas engine cutoff and Agena staging occurred on schedule, and both vehicles plunged into the Atlantic Ocean. Telemetry indicated that a short-to-ground occurred in the circuit for the servoamplifier output command signal, which may have been caused by cryogenic leakage in the thrust section.

While Convair accepted responsibility for the launch failure, Lockheed engineers expressed concern about telemetry data that indicated a servo failure in the Agena, leading to doubts as to whether the stage would have still operated properly if the Atlas hadn't malfunctioned. However, the real cause quickly surfaced when the Air Force released film taken by tracking cameras at Melbourne Beach, Florida, which showed the Atlas pitching over and plummeting downward. Lockheed breathed a sigh of relief when they realized that the servo malfunction was merely due to the Agena passing through the Atlas's ionized exhaust trail.

An ATDA was launched on June 1, 1966, but the shroud that protected the docking adaptor during launch failed to jettison, due to lanyards being incorrectly secured with adhesive tape. Gemini 9A was launched on June 3, and when in orbit, the crew observed that the shroud of the ATDA had partially opened and was described by Stafford as "looking like an angry alligator". Docking was not possible, but the rendezvous maneuver was practiced instead.[2][3][4][5]

Flight statistics

Target Gemini mission Launched Reentered NSSDC ID Mass Comments
GATV-5002 Gemini 6 October 25, 1965
15:00:04 UTC
October 25, 1965
15:06:20 UTC
GEM6T 7,190 pounds (3,260 kg) Atlas-Agena exploded during launch.
Gemini 6A achieved first rendezvous with Gemini 7 instead.
GATV-5003 Gemini 8 March 16, 1966
15:00:03 UTC
September 15, 1967 1966-019A 7,000 pounds (3,200 kg) Achieved first docking, but mission soon aborted due to stuck Gemini thruster.
ATV later used as secondary target on Gemini 10.
GATV-5004 Gemini 9 May 17, 1966
15:12:00 UTC
May 17, 1966
15:19:00 UTC
GEM9TA 7,170 pounds (3,250 kg) Failed to orbit.
ATDA No. 02186 Gemini 9A June 1, 1966
15:00:02 UTC
June 11, 1966 1966-046A 1,750 pounds (790 kg) No Agena rocket. Successful rendezvous, but no docking due to shroud separation failure.
GATV-5005 Gemini 10 July 18, 1966
20:39:46 UTC
December 29, 1966 1966-065A 7,000 pounds (3,200 kg) Boosted Gemini 10 to 412-nautical-mile (763 km) apogee.
GATV-5006 Gemini 11 September 12, 1966
13:05:01 UTC
December 30, 1966 1966-080A 7,000 pounds (3,200 kg) Boosted Gemini 11 to record 739.2-nautical-mile (1,369.0 km) apogee.
First demonstration of artificial gravity created in microgravity.
GATV-5001A Gemini 12 November 11, 1966
19:07:58 UTC
December 23, 1966 1966-103A 7,000 pounds (3,200 kg) No apogee boost due to defective Agena engine. Performed tether experiment.

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Lockheed Missiles & Space Company (1972-02-25). "Shuttle/Agena study. Volume 1: Executive summary". NASA.
  2. "Gemini 9A" (Version 4.0.25 ed.). NASA. August 16, 2013. Retrieved October 30, 2013.
  3. "Gemini 9 Target A" (Version 4.0.25 ed.). NASA. August 16, 2013.
  4. "McDonnell ATDA". Encyclopedia Astronautica. Retrieved June 6, 2012.
  5. "Gemini 9 Target B" (Version 4.0.25 ed.). NASA. August 16, 2013. Retrieved October 30, 2013.

 This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/2/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.