Cryptic female choice

Cryptic female choice is a form of mate choice which occurs both in pre and post copulatory circumstances when females in certain species use physical or chemical mechanisms to control a male’s success of inseminating them; namely by selecting whether sperm are successful in fertilizing their eggs or not. It occurs in internally - fertilizing species and involves differential use of sperm by females after the sperm are in the reproductive tract. Our present understanding of cryptic female choice is largely thanks to the extensive research and analysis done by William G. Eberhard. The term ‘cryptic’ according to Eberhard is meant to describe an internal and thereby hidden choice some female organisms are able to make following insemination with regards to sperm selection.[1]:7–9 In male species with intromittent organs, during sexual intercourse, a male inserts his reproductive organ into that of a female’s so as to inseminate her with his genetic material. Through the development of mechanisms that either prematurely inhibit copulation or act following male insemination, females are able to prevent undesirable males from successfully fertilizing their eggs.[1]:5 Thus, not every copulatory event is successful – there are many factors that combine to determine whether or not an offspring is created. It is likely that cryptic female choice is a consequence of the conflict between the reproductive desires of males and females.[1]:22 While males increase their reproductive success by maximally fertilizing each female they mate with, females incur costs to their personal health as a result of such behavior. Cryptic female choice reduces these costs by allowing them to also benefit from and select for favorable matings.

Theory

Females not only exert sexual control but also benefit from exerting such control over male reproductive success. It has been observed that in some species males continue to court females following copulation, which illuminates the fact above. This female control compels males to continue to impress their female counterparts following copulation.[2] The assumption above can be made because there is an energetic cost for a male to continue to court a female following insemination because he has to invest energy to do so. And, because there is an energetic investment he must benefit in some way. As such, sexual selection does not only act on traits that influence female mate choice of males but it also acts on male traits that determine his success following copulation.

There are circumstances in nature in which a male’s interaction with a female is of detriment to her personal well-being and that of her offspring, one such situation occurs when a male harasses a female prior to copulation. In such circumstances where the female’s lifespan and fertility are compromised, it benefits females to develop evasive mechanisms.[1]:23 In addition, in some species where multiple males inseminate a female, a female is able to select the most desirable sperm for her offspring by rejecting that which she desires less.[1]:233 In both of the aforementioned situations it is a female’s reproductive actions that affect male reproductive success following copulation.[1]:3–7 As discussed below, female species that are able to use cryptic choice have developed various mechanisms to manipulate male reproductive success. Species that are able to use cryptic choice only use one of the below mechanisms to do so. Regardless of the mechanism, this ability allows females to respond differently to conspecific males depending on whether the male that inseminates her is favorable to her or not.[1]:5

Mechanisms of Cryptic Female Choice

Many mechanisms exist in the animal world that allow females to practice cryptic female choice by manipulating which reproductive events are successful or not. These choices can occur at varying stages of the reproductive process.

Pre-Copulation

Pre-Copulation - female cryptic choice can include physical, anatomical, and chemical barriers that can promote or hinder a male’s success in the mating process.[1]:45

Morphology

(Physical/Anatomical): At the pre-copulatory level female cryptic choice consists of the physical and anatomical barriers that females use to decide whether a male is successful or not. This can fall under two subcategories as a result of mating strategies:

In both cases, without the compliance of the female, the male will be unsuccessful in his mating attempt. As such, females can choose for specific male traits by hindering complete intromission or ejaculation during mating.

Chemical

At the pre-copulatory level female cryptic choice can also be employed through chemical means to allow for mating with some males while deceiving other males.

Insemination

Female cryptic choice can also occur after the male has mated and released his sperm.

Fertilization

Females can also exercise cryptic female choice during the fertilization processes.

Sperm bias in storage or transportation

By utilizing sperm storage and transplant, females can exercise cryptic female choice by storing or transplanting sperm to bias sperm success rates towards certain males.[1]:166

Failing to prepare uterus for embryo implantation

Females can control hormonal signals that halt embryo preparation to keep sperm from successfully fertilizing the embryo. They can also promote or hinder ovulation as a means of exercising cryptic female choice. By hindering ovulation, a copulatory interaction may be deemed unsuccessful. In rats and golden hamsters, females denied a male's success by failing to prepare their uterus based on male stimulation.[1]:143

Select for or against sperm during hyperactivation

After insemination, male sperm are relatively slow and inert in the reproductive tracts or storage areas of the female and are only activated by calcium ionophores in vitro. Thus by releasing or withholding the necessary ions to activate the sperm, females can promote faster motility of sperm towards the egg for fertilization or hinder it by slowing their motility and allowing them to die before they reach the egg respectively.[6]

Choosing from among sperm to reach the egg

Female ovarian fluids can promote or hinder sperm especially if they have complementary or uncomplimentary chemical signals. Some females may also physically choose from among spermatophores taken from multiple matings.

Failure to ovulate

Females can sometimes change their differential ovulation responses based on male stimuli to affect male reproductive success. In lions some females will reduce fertility after the male commits infanticide, resulting in low offspring counts after a new male takes over a pride.[1]:135

Gestation

Even after fertilization has occurred, females can exercise cryptic female choice.

Post-Birth

Even after birth has occurred, females can manipulate male offspring success.

Examples

Theropithecus gelada

The wide variety of species around the world provides us with many examples of each mechanism of cryptic female choice. This section provides a more detailed example of a few of the mechanisms of cryptic female choice seen in particular species.

In the Cassadine Plant Beetle, Chelymorpha alternans, the female has a complexly coiled spermathecal duct that frequently reverses in direction. With this reversal, the female is able to discriminate between males’ gentalic sclerite. This is an example of a copulatory mechanism where the female actively hinders a successful mating.[1]:

The Sand Lizard, Lacerta agilis, provides us an example of cryptic female choice during the insemination phase of mating. Females routinely and indiscriminately copulate with several males. The females who mate more often have greater hatching success, lowering the incidence of deformities among offspring, and enhancing survival of free-living offspring. The aforementioned consequences are a result of the females' ability to differentially use the sperm from the least related male. Thus, the males most genetically similar to the female sire less offspring.[7] Some species have a sperm transplant mechanism. Crickets are one such species that can prematurely remove spermatophore after copulation, which terminates sperm transfer. In one study, males were randomly assigned to females to create half-sib families to determine the heritability of spermatophore retention time in females. The researchers found that there was additive genetic variance in the timing of spermatophore removal by females. These results suggest that the timing of the spermatophore removal is determined partly by genotype and is independent of the quality of a female's mate. This shows no difference between the fitness of females who freely remove the spermatophore and the fitness of females that are forced to accept complete ejaculates.[8]

The female spider, Pisaura mirabilis, stores more sperm from males who give a nuptial gift compared to those who share no such gift.[9] This shows a biased use of stored sperm and hence cryptic female choice in a post-copulatory mechanism.

Theropithecus gelada is a wild primate that demonstrates cryptic female choice through a gestation mechanism. The females have been reported to have a strong Bruce effect. Bruce effect is when the female terminates the pregnancy when she is exposed to an unrelated male.[10] This effect is illustrated by the results shown in the graph to the right. Female gelada’s terminate about 80% of their pregnancies the week after the dominant male has been replaced. This could be because males typically perform infanticide when they take over a new group. Terminating a pregnancy could be a female's way to protect herself and avoid infanticide of her young. Studies have been shown to support the hypothesis that the Bruce effect can be an adaptive strategy for females.[10]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Eberhard, William G. (1996). Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. ISBN 9780691010847.
  2. Eberhard, William G. "COPULATORY COURTSHIP AND CRYPTIC FEMALE CHOICE IN INSECTS." Biological Reviews 66.1 (1991): 1-31. Web. <10.1111/j.1469-185X.1991.tb01133.x>
  3. Brennan, Patricia LR, et al. "Coevolution of male and female genital morphology in waterfowl." PLoS one 2.5 (2007): e418.
  4. Reeder, D. M. "The potential for cryptic female choice in primates: behavioral, anatomical, and physiological considerations." Sexual selection and reproductive competition in primates: new perspectives and directions. American Society of Primatologists, Norman (2003): 255-303.
  5. Fedina, Tatyana Yu; Lewis, Sara M. (2004-07-07). "Female influence over offspring paternity in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 271 (1546): 1393–1399. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2731. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 1691742Freely accessible. PMID 15306338.
  6. Ziegler, Andreas, Heribert Kentenich, and Barbara Uchanska-Ziegler. "Female choice and the MHC." Trends in immunology 26.9 (2005): 496-502.
  7. Birkhead, T.R. (1998) Cryptic Female Choice: Criteria for Establishing Female Sperm Choice. Evolution, 52 (4), 1212-1218. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2411251
  8. Mautz, B., & Sakaluk, S. (n.d.). Heritable variation in the timing of spermatophore removal is a mechanism of post-copulatory female choice in crickets. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 1366-1370.
  9. Albo, M., Bilde, T., & Uhl, G. (2013). Sperm storage is mediated by female favoritism for males who present nuptial gifts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 20131735-20131735.
  10. 1 2 Roberts, E. K.; Lu, A.; Bergman, T. J.; Beehner, J. C. (23 February 2012). "A Bruce Effect in Wild Geladas". Science. 335 (6073): 1222–1225. doi:10.1126/science.1213600.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/4/2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.