Epigenetic clock

An epigenetic clock is a type of DNA clock based on measuring natural DNA methylation levels to estimate the biological age of a tissue, cell type or organ. A pre-eminent example for an epigenetic clock is Horvath's clock, which is based on 353 epigenetic markers on the human genome.[1][2][3][4]

History

The strong effect of age on DNA methylation levels has been known since the late 1960s.[5] A vast literature describes sets of CpGs whose DNA methylation levels correlate with age, e.g.[6][7][8][9][10] Two publications describe age estimators based on DNA methylation levels in either saliva [11] or blood.[12]

Horvath's epigenetic clock was developed by Steve Horvath, a professor of human genetics at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and of biostatistics at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health. The scientific article was first published on Oct 21, 2013 in Genome Biology.[1][3] Horvath spent over 4 years collecting publicly available Illumina DNA methylation data and identifying suitable statistical methods.[13] The personal story behind the discovery was featured in Nature.[14] The age estimator was developed using 8,000 samples from 82 Illumina DNA methylation array datasets, encompassing 51 healthy tissues and cell types. The major innovation of Horvath's epigenetic clock lies in its wide applicability: the same set of 353 CpGs and the same prediction algorithm is used irrespective of the DNA source within the organism, i.e. it does not require any adjustments or offsets.[1] This property allows one to compare the ages of different areas of the human body using the same aging clock.

Relationship to a cause of biological aging

It is not yet known what exactly is measured by DNA methylation age. Horvath hypothesized that DNA methylation age measures the cumulative effect of an epigenetic maintenance system but details are unknown. The fact that DNA methylation age of blood predicts all-cause mortality in later life [15][16][17][18] strongly suggests that it relates to a process that causes aging. However, it is unlikely that the 353 clock CpGs are special or play a direct causal role in the aging process.[1] Rather, the epigenetic clock captures an emergent property of the epigenome.

Motivation for biological clocks

In general, biological aging clocks and biomarkers of aging are expected to find many uses in biological research since age is a fundamental characteristic of most organisms. Accurate measures of biological age (biological aging clocks) could be useful for

Overall, biological clocks are expected to be useful for studying what causes aging and what can be done against it.

Properties of Horvath's clock

The clock is defined as an age estimation method based on 353 epigenetic markers on the DNA. The 353 markers measure DNA methylation of CpG dinucleotides. Estimated age ("predicted age" in mathematical usage), also referred to as DNA methylation age, has the following properties: first, it is close to zero for embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells; second, it correlates with cell passage number; third, it gives rise to a highly heritable measure of age acceleration; and, fourth, it is applicable to chimpanzee tissues (which are used as human analogs for biological testing purposes). Organismal growth (and concomitant cell division) leads to a high ticking rate of the epigenetic clock that slows down to a constant ticking rate (linear dependence) after adulthood (age 20).[1] The fact that DNA methylation age of blood predicts all-cause mortality in later life even after adjusting for known risk factors [15][16] suggests that it relates to a process that causes aging. Similarly, markers of physical and mental fitness are associated with the epigenetic clock (lower abilities associated with age acceleration).[19]

Salient features of Horvath's epigenetic clock include its high accuracy and its applicability to a broad spectrum of tissues and cell types. Since it allows one to contrast the ages of different tissues from the same subject, it can be used to identify tissues that show evidence of accelerated age due to disease.

Statistical approach

The basic approach is to form a weighted average of the 353 clock CpGs, which is then transformed to DNAm age using a calibration function. The calibration function reveals that the epigenetic clock has a high ticking rate until adulthood, after which it slows to a constant ticking rate. Using the training data sets, Horvath used a penalized regression model (Elastic net regularization) to regress a calibrated version of chronological age on 21,369 CpG probes that were present both on the Illumina 450K and 27K platform and had fewer than 10 missing values. DNAm age is defined as estimated ("predicted") age. The elastic net predictor automatically selected 353 CpGs. 193 of the 353 CpGs correlate positively with age while the remaining 160 CpGs correlate negatively with age. R software and a freely available web based tool can be found at the following webpage.[20]

Accuracy

The median error of estimated age is 3.6 years across a wide spectrum of tissues and cell types .[1] The epigenetic clock performs well in heterogeneous tissues (for example, whole blood, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, cerebellar samples, occipital cortex, buccal epithelium, colon, adipose, kidney, liver, lung, saliva, uterine cervix, epidermis, muscle) as well as in individual cell types such as CD4 T cells, CD14 monocytes, glial cells, neurons, immortalized B cells, mesenchymal stromal cells.[1] However, accuracy depends to some extent on the source of the DNA. In particular, DNAm age is higher than chronological age in female breast tissue that is adjacent to breast cancer tissue.[1] Since normal tissue, which is adjacent to other cancer types, does not exhibit a similar age acceleration effect, this finding suggests that normal female breast tissue ages faster than other parts of the body.[1]

Comparison with other biological clocks

The epigenetic clock leads to a chronological age prediction that has a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=0.96 with chronological age (Figure 2 in [1]). Thus the age correlation is close to its maximum possible correlation value of 1. Other biological clocks are based on a) telomere length, b) p16INK4a expression levels (also known as INK4a/ARF locus),[21] and c) microsatellite mutations.[22] The correlation between chronological age and telomere length is r=−0.51 in women and r=−0.55 in men.[23] The correlation between chronological age and expression levels of p16INK4a in T cells is r=0.56.[24] p16INK4a expression levels only relate to age in T cells, a type of white blood cells. The microsatellite clock measures not chronological age but age in terms of elapsed cell divisions within a tissue.

Applications of Horvath's clock

By contrasting DNA methylation age (estimated age) with chronological age, one can define measures of age acceleration. Age acceleration can be defined as the difference between DNA methylation age and chronological age. Alternatively, it can be defined as the residual that results from regressing DNAm age on chronological age. The latter measure is attractive because it does not correlate with chronological age. A positive/negative value of epigenetic age acceleration suggests that the underlying tissue ages faster/slower than expected.

Genetic studies of epigenetic age acceleration

The broad sense heritability (defined via Falconer's formula) of age acceleration of blood from older subjects is around 40% but it appears to be much higher in newborns.[1] Similarly, the age acceleration of brain tissue (prefrontal cortex) was found to be 41% in older subjects.[25] Genome-wide association studies of cerebellar age acceleration have identified several SNPs at a genomewide significance level.[26] Gene and SNP sets found by genome-wide association analysis of epigenetic age acceleration exhibit significant overlap with those of Alzheimer’s disease, age-related macular degeneration, and Parkinson’s disease.[26]

Cancer tissue

Cancer tissues show both positive and negative age acceleration effects. For most tumor types, no significant relationship can be observed between age acceleration and tumor morphology (grade/stage).[1][2] On average, cancer tissues with mutated TP53 have a lower age acceleration than those without it.[1] Further, cancer tissues with high age acceleration tend to have fewer somatic mutations than those with low age acceleration.[1][2] Age acceleration is highly related to various genomic aberrations in cancer tissues. Somatic mutations in estrogen receptors or progesterone receptors are associated with accelerated DNAm age in breast cancer.[1] Colorectal cancer samples with a BRAF (V600E) mutation or promoter hypermethylation of the mismatch repair gene MLH1 are associated with an increased age acceleration.[1] Age acceleration in glioblastoma multiforme samples is highly significantly associated with certain mutations in H3F3A.[1] One study suggests that the epigenetic age of blood tissue may be prognostic of lung cancer incidence.[27]

Obesity

The epigenetic clock was used to study the relationship between high body mass index (BMI) and the DNA methylation ages of human blood, liver, muscle and adipose tissue.[28] A significant correlation (r=0.42) between BMI and epigenetic age acceleration could only be observed for the liver.

Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome)

Down Syndrome (DS) entails an increased risk of many chronic diseases that are typically associated with older age. The clinical manifestations of accelerated aging suggest that trisomy 21 increases the biological age of tissues, but molecular evidence for this hypothesis has been sparse. According to the epigenetic clock, trisomy 21 significantly increases the age of blood and brain tissue (on average by 6.6 years).[29]

Alzheimer's disease related neuropathology

Epigenetic age acceleration of the human prefrontal cortex was found to be correlated with several neuropathological measurements that play a role in Alzheimer's disease [25] Further, it was found to be associated with a decline in global cognitive functioning, and memory functioning among individuals with Alzheimer's disease.[25] The epigenetic age of blood relates to cognitive functioning in the elderly.[19] Overall, these results strongly suggest that the epigenetic clock lends itself for measuring the biological age of the brain.

Cerebellum ages slowly

It has been difficult to identify tissues that seem to evade aging due to the lack of biomarkers of tissue age that allow one to contrast compare the ages of different tissues. An application of epigenetic clock to 30 anatomic sites from six centenarians and younger subjects revealed that the cerebellum ages slowly: it is about 15 years younger than expected in a centenarian.[30] This finding might explain why the cerebellum exhibits fewer neuropathological hallmarks of age related dementias compared to other brain regions. In younger subjects (e.g. younger than 70), brain regions and brain cells appear to have roughly the same age.[1][30] Several SNPs and genes have been identified that relate to the epigenetic age of the cerebellum [26]

Huntington's disease

Huntington's disease has been found to increase the epigenetic aging rates of several human brain regions.[31]

Centenarians age slowly

The offspring of semi-supercentenarians (subjects who reached an age of 105–109 years) have a lower epigenetic age than age-matched controls (age difference=5.1 years in blood) and centenarians are younger (8.6 years) than expected based on their chronological age.[18]

HIV infection

Infection with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV) is associated with clinical symptoms of accelerated aging, as evidenced by increased incidence and diversity of age-related illnesses at relatively young ages. But it has been difficult to detect an accelerated aging effect on a molecular level. An epigenetic clock analysis of human DNA from HIV+ subjects and controls detected a significant age acceleration effect in brain (7.4 years) and blood (5.2 years) tissue due to HIV-1 infection.[32]

Parkinson's disease

A large scale study suggests that the blood of Parkinson's disease subjects exhibits (relatively weak) accelerated aging effects.[33]

Developmental disorder: syndrome X

Children with a very rare disorder known as syndrome X maintain the façade of persistent toddler-like features while aging from birth to adulthood. Since the physical development of these children is dramatically delayed, these children appear to be a toddler or at best a preschooler. According to an epigenetic clock analysis, blood tissue from syndrome X cases is not younger than expected.[34]

Menopause accelerates epigenetic aging

The following results strongly suggest that the loss of female hormones resulting from menopause accelerates the epigenetic aging rate of blood and possibly that of other tissues.[35] First, early menopause has been found to be associated with an increased epigenetic age acceleration of blood.[35] Second, surgical menopause (due to bilateral oophorectomy) is associated with epigenetic age acceleration in blood and saliva. Third, menopausal hormone therapy, which mitigates hormonal losss, is associated with a negative age acceleration of buccal cells (but not of blood cells).[35] Fourth, genetic markers that are associated with early menopause are also associated with increased epigenetic age acceleration in blood.[35]

Cellular senescence versus epigenetic aging

A confounding aspect of biological aging is the nature and role of senescent cells. It is unclear whether the three major types of cellular senescence, namely replicative senescence, oncogene-induced senescence and DNA damage-induced senescence are descriptions of the same phenomenon instigated by different sources, or if each of these is distinct, and how they are associated with epigenetic aging. Induction of replicative senescence (RS) and oncogene-induced senescence (OIS) were found to be accompanied by epigenetic aging of primary cells but senescence induced by DNA damage was not, even though RS and OIS activate the cellular DNA damage response pathway.[36] These results highlight the independence of cellular senescence from epigenetic aging. Consistent with this, telomerase-immortalised cells continued to age (according to the epigenetic clock) without having been treated with any senescence inducers or DNA-damaging agents, re-affirming the independence of the process of epigenetic ageing from telomeres, cellular senescence, and the DNA damage response pathway. Although the uncoupling of senescence from cellular aging appears at first sight to be inconsistent with the fact that senescent cells contribute to the physical manifestation of organism ageing, as demonstrated by Baker et al., where removal of senescent cells slowed down aging.[37] However, the epigenetic clock analysis of senescence suggests that cellular senescence is a state that cells are forced into as a result of external pressures such as DNA damage, ectopic oncogene expression and exhaustive proliferation of cells to replenish those eliminated by external/environmental factors.[36] These senescent cells, in sufficient numbers, will probably cause the deterioration of tissues, which is interpreted as organism ageing. However, at the cellular level, aging, as measured by the epigenetic clock, is distinct from senescence. It is an intrinsic mechanism that exists from the birth of the cell and continues. This implies that if cells are not shunted into senescence by the external pressures described above, they would still continue to age. This is consistent with the fact that mice with naturally long telomeres still age and eventually die even though their telomere lengths are far longer than the critical limit, and they age prematurely when their telomeres are forcibly shortened, due to replicative senescence. Therefore, cellular senescence is a route by which cells exit prematurely from the natural course of cellular aging.[36]

Effect of sex and race/ethnicity

Men age faster than women according to epigenetic age acceleration in blood, brain, saliva, and many other tissues. [38] The epignetic clock method applies to all examined racial/ethnic groups in the sense that DNAm age is highly correlated with chronological age. But ethnicity can be associated with epigenetic age acceleration.[38] For example, the blood of Hispanics and Tsimane Amerindians ages more slowly than that of other populations which might explain the Hispanic mortality paradox.[38]

Biological mechanism behind the epigenetic clock

The precise biological mechanism behind the epigenetic clock is currently unknown. However, the following explanations have been proposed in the literature.

Possible explanation 1: Epigenomic maintenance system

Horvath (2013) hypothesized that his clock arises from a methylation footprint left by an epigenomic maintenance system.

Possible explanation 2: Unrepaired DNA damages

Endogenous DNA damages occur frequently including about 50 double-strand DNA breaks per cell cycle[39] and about 10,000 oxidative damages per day (see DNA damage (naturally occurring)). During repair of double-strand breaks many epigenetic alterations are introduced, and in a percentage of cases epigenetic alterations remain after repair is completed, including increased methylation of CpG island promoters.[40][41][42] Similar, but usually transient epigenetic alterations were recently found during repair of oxidative damages caused by H2O2, and it was suggested that occasionally these epigenetic alterations may also remain after repair.[43] These accumulated epigenetic alterations may contribute to the epigenetic clock. Accumulation of epigenetic alterations may parallel the accumulation of un-repaired DNA damages that are proposed to cause aging (see DNA damage theory of aging).

Other age estimators based on DNA methylation levels

Several other age estimators have been described in the literature.

1) Weidner et al. (2014) describe an age estimator for DNA from blood that uses only three CpG sites of genes hardly affected by aging (cg25809905 in integrin, alpha 2b (ITGA2B); cg02228185 in aspartoacylase (ASPA) and cg17861230 in phosphodiesterase 4C, cAMP specific (PDE4C)).[44] The age estimator by Weidener et al. (2014) applies only to blood. Even in blood this sparse estimator is far less accurate than Horvath's epigenetic clock (Horvath 2014) when applied to data generated by the Illumina 27K or 450K platforms. [45] But the sparse estimator was developed for pyrosequencing data and is highly cost effective. [46]

2) Hannum et al. (2013) [12] report several age estimators: one for each tissue type. Each of these estimators requires covariate information (e.g. gender, body mass index, batch). The authors mention that each tissue led to a clear linear offset (intercept and slope). Therefore, the authors had to adjust the blood based age estimator for each tissue type using a linear model. When the Hannum estimator is applied to other tissues, it leads to a high error (due to poor calibration) as can be seen from Figure 4A in Hannum et al. (2013). Hannum et al. adjusted their blood based age estimator (by adjusting the slope and the intercept term) in order to apply it to other tissue types. Since this adjustment step removes differences between tissue, the blood based estimator from Hannum et al. cannot be used to compare the ages of different tissues/organs. In contrast, a salient characteristic of the epigenetic clock is that one does not have to carry out such a calibration step:[1] it always uses the same CpGs and the same coefficient values. Therefore, Horvath's epigenetic clock can be used to compare the ages of different tissues/cells/organs from the same individual. While the age estimators from Hannum et al. cannot be used to compare the ages of different normal tissues, they can be used to compare the age of a cancerous tissue with that of a corresponding normal (non-cancerous) tissue. Hannum et al. reported pronounced age acceleration effects in all cancers. In contrast, Horvath's epigenetic clock [2][47] reveals that some cancer types (e.g. triple negative breast cancers or uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma) exhibit negative age acceleration, i.e. cancer tissue can be much younger than expected. An important difference relates to additional covariates. Hannum's age estimators make use of covariates such as gender, body mass index, diabetes status, ethnicity, and batch. Since new data involve different batches, one cannot apply it directly to new data. However, the authors present coefficient values for their CpGs in Supplementary Tables which can be used to define an aggregate measure that tends to be strongly correlated with chronological age but may be poorly calibrated (i.e. lead to high errors).

3.) Giuliani et al. identify genomic regions whose DNA methylation level correlates with age in human teeth. They propose the evaluation of DNA methylation at ELOVL2, FHL2, and PENK genes in DNA recovered from both cementum and pulp of the same modern teeth.[50] They wish to apply this method also to historical and relatively ancient human teeth.

In a multicenter benchmarking study 18 research groups from three continents compared all promising methods for analyzing DNA methylation in the clinic and identified the most accurate methods, having concluded that epigenetic tests based on DNA methylation are a mature technology ready for broad clinical use.[51]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Horvath, S (2013). "DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types". Genome Biology. 2013 (14): R115. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115. PMC 4015143Freely accessible. PMID 24138928.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Horvath, S (2015). "Erratum to: DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types". Genome Biology. 16 (1): 96. doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0649-6. PMID 25968125.
  3. 1 2 University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Health Sciences (20 October 2013). "Scientist uncovers internal clock able to measure age of most human tissues; Women's breast tissue ages faster than rest of body". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 22 October 2013.
  4. ↑ University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Health Sciences (21 October 2013). "Scientists discover new biological clock with age-measuring potential". Forbes. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
  5. ↑ Berdyshev, G; Korotaev, G; Boiarskikh, G; Vaniushin, B (1967). "Nucleotide composition of DNA and RNA from somatic tissues of humpback and its changes during spawning". Biokhimiia. 31: 88–993.
  6. ↑ Rakyan, VK; Down, TA; Maslau, S; Andrew, T; Yang, TP; Beyan, H; Whittaker, P; McCann, OT; Finer, S; Valdes, AM; Leslie, RD; Deloukas, P; Spector, TD (2010). "Human aging-associated DNA hypermethylation occurs preferentially at bivalent chromatin domains". Genome Res. 20: 434–439. doi:10.1101/gr.103101.109.
  7. ↑ Teschendorff, AE; Menon, U; Gentry-Maharaj, A; Ramus, SJ; Weisenberger, DJ; Shen, H; Campan, M; Noushmehr, H; Bell, CG; Maxwell, AP; Savage, DA; Mueller-Holzner, E; Marth, C; Kocjan, G; Gayther, SA; Jones, A; Beck, S; Wagner, W; Laird, PW; Jacobs, IJ; Widschwendter, M (2010). "Age-dependent DNA methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells is a hallmark of cancer". Genome Res. 20: 440–446. doi:10.1101/gr.103606.109.
  8. ↑ Koch, CM; Wagner, W (Oct 2011). "Epigenetic-aging-signature to determine age in different tissues". Aging. 3 (10): 1018–27.
  9. ↑ Horvath, S; Zhang, Y; Langfelder, P; Kahn, R; Boks, M; van Eijk, K; van den Berg, L; Ophoff, RA (2012). "Aging effects on DNA methylation modules in human brain and blood tissue". Genome Biol. 13 (10): R97. doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-r97. PMID 23034122.
  10. ↑ Bell, JT; Tsai, PC; Yang, TP; Pidsley, R; Nisbet, J; Glass, D; Mangino, M; Zhai, G; Zhang, F; Valdes, A; Shin, SY; Dempster, EL; Murray, RM; Grundberg, E; Hedman, AK; Nica, A; Small, KS; Dermitzakis, ET; McCarthy, MI; Mill, J; Spector, TD; Deloukas, P (2012). "Epigenome-wide scans identify differentially methylated regions for age and age-related phenotypes in a healthy ageing population". PLoS Genet. 8: e1002629. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002629.
  11. ↑ Bocklandt, S; Lin, W; Sehl, ME; Sánchez, FJ; Sinsheimer, JS; Horvath, S; Vilain, E (2011). "Epigenetic Predictor of Age". PLoS ONE. 6 (6): e14821. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014821. PMC 3120753Freely accessible. PMID 21731603.
  12. 1 2 Hannum, G; Guinney, J; Zhao, L; Zhang, L; Hughes, G; Sadda, S; Klotzle, B; Bibikova, M; Fan, JB; Gao, Y; Deconde, R; Chen, M; Rajapakse, I; Friend, S; Ideker, T; Zhang, K (2013). "Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates". Mol Cell. 49: 359–367. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016. PMID 23177740.
  13. ↑ Biome on 21st October 2013 Novel epigenetic clock predicts tissue age
  14. ↑ Gibbs, WT (2014). "Biomarkers and ageing: The clock-watcher". Nature. 508: 168–170. doi:10.1038/508168a.
  15. 1 2 Chen, B; Marioni, ME (2016). "DNA methylation-based measures of biological age: meta-analysis predicting time to death.". Aging (US Albany). 8 (9): 1844–1865. doi:10.18632/aging.101020. PMC 5076441Freely accessible. PMID 27690265.
  16. 1 2 Marioni, R; Shah, S; McRae, A; Chen, B; Colicino, E; Harris, S; Gibson, J; Henders, A; Redmond, P; Cox, S; Pattie, A; Corley, J; Murphy, L; Martin, N; Montgomery, G; Feinberg, A; Fallin, M; Multhaup, M; Jaffe, A; Joehanes, R; Schwartz, J; Just, A; Lunetta, K; Murabito, JM; Starr, J; Horvath, S; Baccarelli, A; Levy, D; Visscher, P; Wray, N; Deary, I (2015). "DNA methylation age of blood predicts all-cause mortality in later life". Genome Biology. 16 (1): 25. doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0584-6.
  17. ↑ Christiansen, L (2015). "DNA methylation age is associated with mortality in a longitudinal Danish twin study". Aging Cell. 15 (1): 149–154. doi:10.1111/acel.12421.
  18. 1 2 Horvath, S (2015). "Decreased epigenetic age of PBMCs from Italian semi-supercentenarians and their offspring.". Aging (Albany NY) (Dec).
  19. 1 2 Marioni, R; Shah, S; McRae, A; Ritchie, S; Muniz-Terrera, GH; SE; Gibson, J; Redmond, P; SR, C; Pattie, A; Corley, J; Taylor, A; Murphy, L; Starr, J; Horvath, S; Visscher, P; Wray, N; Deary, I (2015). "The epigenetic clock is correlated with physical and cognitive fitness in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936". Int J of Epidemiology. 44: 1388–1396. doi:10.1093/ije/dyu277. PMID 25617346.
  20. ↑ DNA methylation age software
  21. ↑ Collado, M; Blasco, MA; Serrano, M (Jul 2007). "Cellular senescence in cancer and aging". Cell. 130 (2): 223–33. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.003.
  22. ↑ Forster P, Hohoff C, Dunkelmann B, Schürenkamp M, Pfeiffer H, Neuhuber F, Brinkmann B. (2015) "Elevated germline mutation rate in teenage fathers". Proc Biol Sci 282:20142898
  23. ↑ Nordfjäll, K; Svenson, U; Norrback, KF; Adolfsson, R; Roos, G (Mar 2010). "Large-scale parent-child comparison confirms a strong paternal influence on telomere length". Eur J Hum Genet. 18 (3): 385–9. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2009.178. PMID 19826452.
  24. ↑ Wang, Y; Zang, X; Wang, Y; Chen, P (2012). "High expression of p16INK4a and low expression of Bmi1 are associated with endothelial cellular senescence in the human cornea" (PDF). Molecular Vision. 18: 803–815.
  25. 1 2 3 Levine, M (2015). "Epigenetic age of the pre-frontal cortex is associated with neuritic plaques, amyloid load, and Alzheimer's disease related cognitive functioning". Aging (Albany NY). 7 (Dec): 1198–211. PMC 4712342Freely accessible. PMID 26684672.
  26. 1 2 3 Lu, A (2016). "Genetic variants near MLST8 and DHX57 affect the epigenetic age of the cerebellum.". Nature Communications. 7: 10561. doi:10.1038/ncomms10561.
  27. ↑ Levine, M (2015). "DNA methylation age of blood predicts future onset of lung cancer in the women's health initiative.". Aging (Albany NY). 7: 690–700. doi:10.18632/aging.100809. PMC 4600626Freely accessible. PMID 26411804.
  28. ↑ Horvath, S; Erhart, W; Brosch, M; Ammerpohl, O; von Schoenfels, W; Ahrens, M; Heits, N; Bell, JT; Tsai, PC; Spector, TD; Deloukas, P; Siebert, R; Sipos, B; Becker, T; Roecken, C; Schafmayer, C; Hampe, J (2014). "Obesity accelerates epigenetic aging of human liver". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111: 15538–43. doi:10.1073/pnas.1412759111. PMID 25313081.
  29. ↑ Horvath, S; Garagnani, P; Bacalini, MG; Pirazzini, C; Salvioli, S; Gentilini, D; Di Blasio, AM; Giuliani, C; Tung, S; Vinters, HV; Franceschi, C (Feb 2015). "Accelerated epigenetic aging in Down syndrome". Aging Cell. 14: 491–5. doi:10.1111/acel.12325. PMID 25678027.
  30. 1 2 Horvath, S; Mah, V; Lu, AT; Woo, JS; Choi, OW; Jasinska, AJ; Riancho, JA; Tung, S; Coles, NS; Braun, J; Vinters, HV; Coles, LS (2015). "The cerebellum ages slowly according to the epigenetic clock" (PDF). Aging (Albany NY). 7 (5): 294–306. doi:10.18632/aging.100742. PMID 26000617.
  31. ↑ Horvath, S (2016). "Huntington's disease accelerates epigenetic aging of human brain and disrupts DNA methylation levels". Aging (Albany NY). 8 (7): 1485–512. doi:10.18632/aging.101005. PMC 4993344Freely accessible. PMID 27479945.
  32. ↑ Horvath, S; Levine, AJ (2015). "HIV-1 infection accelerates age according to the epigenetic clock". J Infect Dis. 212: 1563–73. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiv277. PMID 25969563.
  33. ↑ Horvath, S (2015). "Increased epigenetic age and granulocyte counts in the blood of Parkinson's disease patients.". Aging (Albany NY). 7: 1130–42. doi:10.18632/aging.100859. PMC 4712337Freely accessible. PMID 26655927.
  34. ↑ Walker, RF; Liu, JS; Peters, BA; Ritz, BR; Wu, T; Ophoff, RA; Horvath, S (2015). "Epigenetic age analysis of children who seem to evade aging". Aging (Albany NY). 7 (5): 334–9. PMID 25991677.
  35. 1 2 3 4 Levine, M (2016). "Menopause accelerates biological aging". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA: 201604558. doi:10.1073/pnas.1604558113. PMID 27457926.
  36. 1 2 3 Lowe, D (2016). "Epigenetic clock analyses of cellular senescence and ageing.". Oncotarget. 7 (8): 8524–8531. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7383. PMID 26885756.
  37. ↑ Baker, DJ (2011). "Clearance of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells delays ageing-associated disorders.". Nature. 479 (7372): 232–6. doi:10.1038/nature10600. PMC 3468323Freely accessible. PMID 22048312.
  38. 1 2 3 Horvath S, Gurven M, Levine ME, Trumble BC, Kaplan H, Allayee H, Ritz BR, Chen B, Lu AT, Rickabaugh TM, Jamieson BD, Sun D, Li S, Chen W, Quintana-Murci L, Fagny M, Kobor MS, Tsao PS, Reiner AP, Edlefsen KL, Absher D, Assimes TL (2016). "An epigenetic clock analysis of race/ethnicity, sex, and coronary heart disease.". Genome Biol. 17 (1): 171. doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1030-0. PMC 4980791Freely accessible. PMID 27511193.
  39. ↑ Vilenchik MM, Knudson AG (2003). "Endogenous DNA double-strand breaks: production, fidelity of repair, and induction of cancer". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (22): 12871–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.2135498100. PMC 240711Freely accessible. PMID 14566050.
  40. ↑ Cuozzo C, Porcellini A, Angrisano T, Morano A, Lee B, Di Pardo A, Messina S, Iuliano R, Fusco A, Santillo MR, Muller MT, Chiariotti L, Gottesman ME, Avvedimento EV (2007). "DNA damage, homology-directed repair, and DNA methylation". PLoS Genet. 3 (7): e110. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030110. PMC 1913100Freely accessible. PMID 17616978.
  41. ↑ O'Hagan HM, Mohammad HP, Baylin SB (2008). "Double strand breaks can initiate gene silencing and SIRT1-dependent onset of DNA methylation in an exogenous promoter CpG island". PLoS Genet. 4 (8): e1000155. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000155. PMC 2491723Freely accessible. PMID 18704159.
  42. ↑ Morano A, Angrisano T, Russo G, Landi R, Pezone A, Bartollino S, Zuchegna C, Babbio F, Bonapace IM, Allen B, Muller MT, Chiariotti L, Gottesman ME, Porcellini A, Avvedimento EV (2014). "Targeted DNA methylation by homology-directed repair in mammalian cells. Transcription reshapes methylation on the repaired gene". Nucleic Acids Res. 42 (2): 804–21. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt920. PMC 3902918Freely accessible. PMID 24137009.
  43. ↑ Ding N, Bonham EM, Hannon BE, Amick TR, Baylin SB, O'Hagan HM (2016). "Mismatch repair proteins recruit DNA methyltransferase 1 to sites of oxidative DNA damage". J Mol Cell Biol. 8 (3): 244–54. doi:10.1093/jmcb/mjv050. PMID 26186941. free version at http://jmcb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/08/06/jmcb.mjv050
  44. ↑ Weidner, C. I.; Lin, Q.; Koch, C. M.; Eisele, L.; Beier, F.; Ziegler, P.; Wagner, W. (2014). "Aging of blood can be tracked by DNA methylation changes at just three CpG sites". Genome Biology. 15 (2): R24. doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r24. PMID 24490752.
  45. ↑ Horvath S (2014-02-18 16:34) Comparison with the epigenetic clock (2014). Reader Comment.
  46. ↑ Wagner W (2014) Response to comment "comparison with the epigenetic clock by Horvath 2013"
  47. ↑ Horvath S (2013-11-04 11:00) Erratum in cancer tissues Reader Comment
  48. ↑ "Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates.". Mol Cell. 49: 359–67. Jan 2013. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016. PMID 23177740.
  49. ↑ "Aging of blood can be tracked by DNA methylation changes at just three CpG sites.". Genome Biol. 15: R24. 2014. doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r24. PMID 24490752.
  50. ↑ Giuliani, C.; Cilli, E.; Bacalini, M. G.; Pirazzini, C.; Sazzini, M.; Gruppioni, G.; Franceschi, C.; Garagnani, P.; Luiselli, D. (2016). "Inferring chronological age from DNA methylation patterns of human teeth". Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 159: 585–595. doi:10.1002/ajpa.22921.
  51. ↑ Christoph Bock et al. (2016). Quantitative comparison of DNA methylation assays for biomarker development and clinical applications. Nature Biotechnology, doi:10.1038/nbt.3605
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/11/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.