Operation Inmate

Operation Inmate
Part of Pacific War, World War II
Black and white aerial photo of shoreline with smoke rising from buildings in the centre of the image
Shells from a British Pacific Fleet cruiser falling on Japanese oil tanks at Truk during the 15 June 1945 bombardment
Date14–15 June 1945
LocationTruk
Result Allied force achieved its goals
Belligerents
 United Kingdom
 Canada
 New Zealand
 United States
 Empire of Japan
Commanders and leaders
United Kingdom E.J.P. Brind
Casualties and losses
2 killed
1 aircraft destroyed in combat
6 aircraft destroyed in accidents
Damage to airfields and other infrastructure
2 aircraft believed destroyed

Operation Inmate was a British Pacific Fleet attack against Japanese positions on Truk Atoll in the central Pacific Ocean during World War II. The attacks against the lightly-defended islands on 14 and 15 June 1945 were conducted to provide combat experience for the aircraft carrier HMS Implacable and several of the fleet's cruisers and destroyers ahead of their involvement in more demanding operations off Japan.

On 14 June 1945 British aircraft conducted a series of raids against Japanese positions at Truk. During the next morning several islands in the atoll were bombarded by cruisers, though only one of the four warships involved achieved any success. Further air strikes took place in the afternoon and night of 15 June before the Allied force returned to its base.

The attack on Truk was considered successful for the Allied force, with the ships and air units involved gaining useful experience while suffering only two fatalities and the loss of seven aircraft to combat and accidents. The damage to the Japanese facilities in the atoll, which had been attacked repeatedly during 1944 and 1945, was considered to be relatively modest.

Background

The British aircraft carrier HMS Implacable was dispatched from the United Kingdom in February 1945 to reinforce the British Pacific Fleet (BPF). The ship arrived at the BPF's main base at Sydney in Australia on 8 May.[1] At this time, the main body of the BPF was operating off Okinawa in the North Pacific.[2] On 24 May Implacable departed Sydney, and arrived at the BPF's forward base at Manus Island on the 29th of the month. Several days later the remainder of the BPF arrived at Manus to refuel before most of its ships continued to Sydney for a period of rest and maintenance.[1]

Black and white photo of a World War II-era aircraft carrier in front of a steel through arched bridge. Several other ships are visible near the aircraft carrier
HMS Implacable arriving at Sydney on 8 May 1945

As part of the preparations for the BPF's return to combat, Admiral Bernard Rawlings - the commander of the fleet's combat force - decided to dispatch Implacable and several other recently arrived warships to attack the Japanese positions at Truk. The purpose of this operation was to ensure that the warships' crews had recent combat experience before the BPF commenced operations off Japan during July.[1]

During the early years of the Pacific War Truk Atoll had been an important base for the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN), using facilities which had been constructed there before the outbreak of hostilities. However, it was isolated by the rapid Allied advances in the Pacific during 1943 and early 1944, and ceased to be a significant base after being heavily attacked by the United States Navy's Fast Carrier Task Force during Operation Hailstone in February 1944.[3] Nevertheless, the facilities at Truk could have potentially been used to raid the important Allied facilities which had been established in the Mariana Islands and the major US Navy anchorage at Ulithi. To prevent the islands from being used for this purpose, they were repeatedly attacked by American aircraft carriers which were preparing to join the Fast Carrier Task Force; like the British operation in June 1945, these raids were also conducted to provide combat experience for the American airmen.[4]

The Truk attack force was designated Task Group 111.2, and comprised the 4th Cruiser Squadron and 24th Destroyer Flotilla. The ships assigned to the 4th Cruiser Squadron were Implacable, the escort carrier HMS Ruler and cruisers HMS Swiftsure, Newfoundland, HMCS Uganda and HMNZS Achilles. The 24th Destroyer Flotilla was made up of Troubridge, Teazer, Tenacious, Termagant and Terpsichore. The Task Group was commanded from Implacable by Rear Admiral E.J.P. Brind. While Implacable, Newfoundland and the destroyers had recently arrived in the Pacific, all the other ships assigned to Task Group 111.2 had seen combat off Okinawa.[1] Implacable's most recent combat experience was a series of air strikes conducted against German forces in Norway.[5]

Implacable embarked 80 aircraft, which was the largest air group of any of the BPF's aircraft carriers. The air group included 38 Naval Air Wing, whose 801 and 880 Naval Air Squadrons operated 48 Supermarine Seafire fighter aircraft. The other units assigned to the carrier were 828 Naval Air Squadron with 21 Grumman TBF Avenger torpedo bombers and 1771 Naval Air Squadron, which was equipped with 11 Fairey Firefly fighters.[6] Ruler was intended to be used as a "spare deck" for Implacable's air group, and embarked only a single Supermarine Walrus search and rescue aircraft from 1701 Naval Air Squadron.[6][7]

Attacks

14 June

Black and white aerial photo of a multi-story building with a tall mast next to it. Smoke is visible in the air in front of the building.
Rockets being fired from a Firefly at the radio station on Moen island

Task Group 111.2 departed from Manus Island on 12 June. While en route to Truk, its orders were broadened from attacking the atoll with air strikes for two days to also include bombarding the islands with gunfire from the cruisers. This change was made as the cruisers were expected to be used against shore targets during future operations.[6] In preparation for these bombardments, the Task Group conducted gunnery exercises during its voyage north.[5] Ahead of the attacks on Truk, a US Navy submarine took up position near the atoll to rescue any British airmen who crashed into the sea.[8]

The Allied warships reached the flying off position for Implacable's air group at 5:30 am on 14 June. Ten minutes later, twelve Seafires and two Fireflies were launched. The Seafires strafed a radar station and airfield on Moen island, and the Fireflies reconnoitred the atoll. A Seafire equipped with a reconnaissance camera also photographed Japanese installations; these photos were used to plan further air attacks and bombardments.[6] One of the Seafires was shot down while attacking the airfield, resulting in the death of its pilot. This was the only British aircraft to be lost in combat during Operation Inmate.[9]

For the remainder of 14 June Implacable launched strikes every two and a quarter hours. These generally consisted of five Avengers armed with bombs and four Fireflies with rockets and cannon. The final attack of the day was made by twelve Seafires which dive bombed fuel tanks on Moen island. While several of the tanks were cracked open, it appeared that they were empty.[6] This attack was the first time that Seafires had been used as fighter bombers in the Pacific.[9] The British aircraft were fired on by Japanese anti-aircraft guns throughout the day, and reported finding few worthwhile targets.[10] During the night of 14/15 June two Avengers operated over the atoll in an attempt to prevent the Japanese from repairing the airfield on Moen; these aircraft were also fired on and tracked by searchlights but did not suffer any casualties.[10]

38 Naval Air Wing maintained a protective combat air patrol of eight Seafires over Task Group 111.2 throughout 14 June, but these did not encounter any Japanese aircraft. Ruler was used as the base for this task, and refuelled and rearmed Seafires between sorties.[11] During the morning of 14 June Ruler's Walrus was blown overboard by a tropical squall and destroyed. Aerial search and rescue support for the force was subsequently provided by US Navy Consolidated PBY Catalina flying boats which flew in relay near Truk.[12]

15 June

The surface bombardment took place during the late morning of 15 June. The bombardment force was organised into three task units comprising both cruisers and destroyers; Achilles and Uganda (with Brind embarked) operated with Tenacious, Newfoundland was accompanied by Troubridge and Swiftsure by Teazer. Each task unit was assigned two Seafires to spot their gunfire. This left the aircraft carriers with only two destroyers for protection.[8][13] Throughout the bombardments the carriers sailed 10 miles (16 km) to the east of Truk, and maintained a combat air patrol over the area.[13]

The cruisers experienced differing levels of success. Newfoundland initially attacked gun coastal batteries, but these did not fire on her or her escorting destroyer. She subsequently successfully bombarded the airfield on Eten Island.[8] The attacks by Achilles and Uganda on a seaplane base on Dublon Island did not cause any damage and were marred by communications problems.[8] As Achilles sailed away from Truk, the cruiser's anti-aircraft gunners fired on two aircraft which approached her from the direction of the atoll until they were identified as British Avengers.[14]

Swiftsure's bombardment of Moen was particularly unsuccessful. The initial rounds fired by her guns landed well away from their targets, and attempts to correct her gunfire led to a further deterioration in accuracy. Her gunnery officer judged that the ship's fire control equipment was defective, and ordered the 6-inch (15 cm) gun turrets to fire under local control. This also proved unsuccessful as the gunners were unable to sight targets on the shore. Swiftsure subsequently sailed closer to the shore, and attempted to engage Japanese positions with several of her 4-inch (10 cm) guns. However, the ammunition for these weapons was fitted with proximity fuses intended for use against aircraft, and exploded in the palm trees above her targets. As the fallen foliage camouflaged the Japanese positions further attacks were ineffective.[15][16] A subsequent investigation found that a faulty split pin had fallen out of Swiftsure's Admiralty Fire Control Table, most likely due to concussion from the initial shot, leading it to provide greatly inaccurate results to the guns.[17]

Further air attacks were also conducted on 15 June. During the afternoon, two groups of Avengers attacked a floating dry dock and several oil tanks. That night six Avengers armed with bombs supported by two flare-dropping Avengers conducted the final British attack on Truk, but it is believed that most of their bombs landed in the sea. This was the BPF's first large-scale night operation.[18]

At the conclusion of the night strike Task Group 111.2 departed for Manus Island. On 16 June a Japanese aircraft was detected by radar. While one of the Seafires was detached from the combat air patrol to intercept it, the fighter's pilot had to abandon the attempt due to a mechanical problem. The Task Group arrived at Manus Island on 17 June, and continued training exercises there until the remainder of the BPF arrived on 4 July en route to further operations off Japan.[19] All of the warships at Manus sailed on 6 July to join the Fast Carrier Task Force in attacks on the Japanese home islands.[20]

Aftermath

Historian David Hobbs has judged that Operation Inmate "provided realistic and useful training for ships that were newly arrived in the Pacific and everyone, including Swiftsure's embarrassed gunners, ... learned something".[21] Peter C. Smith has also noted that while few targets were located, the raids provided useful experience for Implacable's air crew and "the standards of flight launch and recovery attained during the operation were to stand them in good stead in the months ahead".[15] Similarly, British Official historian Stephen Roskill concluded that Operation Inmate achieved its goals.[22] In addition to the Seafire shot down on 14 June and Ruler's Walrus, five Avengers were destroyed due to accidents while taking off; one of these aircraft crashed into the sea due to an error in fixing it to Implacable's catapult, resulting in the death of its pilot. The other four Avengers ditched due to engine malfunctions but did their crews did not suffer any fatalities. Two Seafires, both piloted by the same airman, were also damaged in landing accidents.[9] A book published to mark the 50th anniversary of the BPF described these losses as low by the standards of 1945.[23]

Japanese losses were also believed to be modest. The British assessed that two Japanese aircraft had been destroyed and another three damaged during attacks on airfields at Truk. Damage was also believed to have been inflicted on the airfields, floating dry dock, oil tanks, other harbour installations and ships that were attacked.[9] Following the operation Brind assessed that rockets had proven more useful than bombs, and was critical of the gunnery of all the cruisers other than Newfoundland.[24]

A new Task Group 111.2 was formed by the BPF at Sydney on 12 August 1945. This force comprised the veteran aircraft carrier HMS Indomitable, three newly arrived light fleet carriers, two battleships, two or three cruisers and nine destroyers.[25] These ships were intended to reinforce the BPF for the planned invasion of Japan, but lacked recent combat experience. Consideration was given to using the force to attack Truk again, with this operation possibly also including an invasion of the atoll by Australian or New Zealand forces, but this came to nothing as the war ended with Japan's decision to surrender on 15 August.[26]

References

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Hobbs 2011, p. 199.
  2. Roskill 1961, p. 362.
  3. Hobbs 2011, pp. 199–201.
  4. Hobbs 2011, p. 202.
  5. 1 2 Smith 1969, p. 163.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Hobbs 2011, p. 203.
  7. Brown 2009, p. 100.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Hobbs 2011, p. 207.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Hobbs 2011, p. 211.
  10. 1 2 Hobbs 2011, p. 205.
  11. Hobbs 2011, pp. 203–205.
  12. Hobbs 2011, pp. 205–207.
  13. 1 2 Smith 1969, p. 164.
  14. Waters 1956, p. 389.
  15. 1 2 Smith 1969, p. 165.
  16. Hobbs 2011, p. 207–208.
  17. Hobbs 2011, p. 208.
  18. Hobbs 2011, p. 209.
  19. Hobbs 2011, pp. 210, 253.
  20. Hobbs 2011, p. 254.
  21. Hobbs 2011, p. 210.
  22. Roskill 1961, p. 363.
  23. Vincent 1995, p. 79.
  24. Hobbs 2011, pp. 209, 211.
  25. Robb-Webb 2013, p. 69.
  26. Robb-Webb 2013, p. 70.

Works consulted

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/14/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.