QSK operation (full break-in)
Turning over a communications channel is the change in communications protocol transmission status that occurs when a transmitting station releases transmitting control of a communications channel thus turning it over to allow another station to transmit. QSK or full break-in operation is one of several techniques and protocols for turning over control of a Morse code radiotelegraph communications channel. QSK is a three-letter code group that is one of the numerous Morse code three-letter code groups belonging to the venerable International Q-code established for radiotelegraph operators in the first decade of the 1900s. The three letter code group QSK literally means "I can hear you between my signals; you may break in on my transmission." Because of this, full break-in operation is often referred to as QSK operation. Although radiotelegraphy and Morse code is no longer used for commercial or professional purposes it continues to thrive and grow in the amateur radio community hobby. Today's modern era radio amateurs seem to be as interested in so-called full break-in or QSK operation as professional operators were in the early twentieth century.
Although Morse code preceded modern coded modulation techniques by more than a century, in terms of Claude Shannon's modern Information Theory, Morse code can be seen essentially as an encoded method of signaling that simultaneously comprises both a source code (Data compression code) and a channel code (Modulation code). The Morse code source code was created by Samuel Morse's assistant Alfred Vail when Vail assigned the shortest Morse code symbols to the most often occurring (English language) source symbols (alpha-numeric characters and punctuation marks), in the style of today's modern data compression codes such as the modern Information Theory based: Huffman, Arithmetic, and Lempel-Ziv-Welsh codes. Morse code symbols are variable length sequences of: dot signals, dash signals, and dot duration silent periods. Vail based his Morse code on the English language source with the shortest Morse symbol, a sequence composed of a single Morse code dot followed by a single dot duration silent period, encoding the most often used English letter "E" with corresponding longer sequences used for less common English letters. Besides assigning Morse code symbols to alpha-numeric and punctuation characters of the information source language symbols the early creators of Morse code also assigned additional procedural symbols to the Morse code related to page formatting of documents and to control and turn over of telegraph communication channels.
When developed in the mid-1800s, Morse code telegraphy was first used for signaling over wires and underwater cables. With the introduction of wireless (radio) by Guglielmo Marconi in the early 1900s Morse code was quickly adapted to the new radio technology giving rise to radiotelegraphy. Morse code's channel code, known as on-off keying or OOK modulation, is also known in modern channel code parlance as unipolar encoding. Unipolar encoding is the simplest form of amplitude modulation (AM) composed of only two amplitudes; the two amplitudes known generically as "on" and "off". The "off" state is simply a no-signal silent period the "on" state is simply a full power signal. Signaling using OOK by keying a single frequency radio carrier, as opposed to using damped transient oscillations triggered by spark gaps as originally developed by Marconi, historically then became known as continuous wave or simply CW signaling instead of spark; the nomenclature CW being inappropriate as it happens, since the keyed radio carrier is certainly not continuous because of the ubiquitous silent periods present in the OOK modulation generated by the Morse code! Historically CW has also been known as wireless telegraphy (W/T), or simply as radiotelegraphy. Modern era radio amateurs (hams) usually refer to the use of keyed carrier Morse code simply as "CW". It is the presence of the ubiquitous silent (off) periods in CW that is the most important aspect of the Morse code OOK modulation code that provides the "listen while sending" support for so-called QSK operation.
With QSK or full break-in operation the ubiquitous silent periods of the Morse code, allows operators to listen between their transmitted signals as they send, and thus enables a fluid conversational style of high speed communications between skilled CW operators that closely approximates the style of normal human voice communications.
Simplex and duplex channels
Radiotelegraph stations generally comprise: a transmitter, a receiver, and one or more antennas. A radiotelegraph channel comprises two stations and a radio wave propagation path between the two stations.
Simplex channels
A radiotelegraph simplex channel, operates by sending information in one direction only (e.g. a broadcast channel). A simplex channel may comprise only a transmitting station with only a transmitter and a transmit antenna on the sending end coupled with a receiving station comprising only a receive antenna and a receiver on the receiving end. Such simplex channels may be contrasted with duplex channels which have fully equipped stations on both ends and are capable of sending information in both directions.
Duplex channels
A radiotelegraph duplex channel comprises a transmitter and a receiver combination (transceiver) together with one or two antennas at a station on one end of the channel coupled with a similar complement for the station on the other end; in contrast to a simplex channel, it is possible for both stations on a duplex channel to send information to each other. Duplexing protocols refer to the manner in which a duplex channel is shared by the respective operators; duplex channel operators may employ either full-duplex or half-duplex protocols.
If a duplex channel can be operated only one way at a time it is styled a half-duplex channel and half-duplex protocols must be used. If a duplex channel can be shared and operated in both directions simultaneously it is styled a full-duplex channel and full-duplex protocols may be used.
Full break-in or QSK operation is a technique and protocol used on radiotelegraph half-duplex channels that closely approximates the feeling of operating on a full-duplex channel. e.g. It appears to the QSK operators half-duplex operators that both directions can be used simultaneously.
T/R switches
On half-duplex channels the radio station: receiver, transmitter, and antenna or antennas are usually interconnected by so-called transmit/receive or (T/R) switches that effectively connect and disconnect the receiver and transmitter from the antenna or antennas as required by the radiotelegraph channel protocol in use. T/R switches may be controlled by a variety of techniques. Typical T/R switch control methods and protocols are: manual operation, automatic semi break-in operation and automatic full break-in operation. T/R switches are analog high power radio frequency or RF switch devices which may take many practical forms ranging all the way from simple mechanical manually operated knife switches to fully automated modern semiconductor devices.
Signals, silent periods and symbols
Signals and silent periods
In Morse code the basic signals are dots and dashes often verbalized as "dits" and "dahs". According to the rules of Morse code. The dot duration is the basic unit of time measurement. The dash duration is equal to three dot durations. At a 20 word per minute (wpm) sending rate the dot duration is approximately 50 milliseconds (0.05 seconds); at faster speeds the dot duration is commensurately shorter. The reciprocal of the dot duration is known as the dotting rate. The length of the dash signal is three dot durations. The Morse code dot and dash signals are always separated from each other by a silent period of at least one dot duration.
In terms of on-off keying (OOK) the Morse code consists of either signal or no signal respectively either state of which may persist over time in a variety of epochs measured in terms of the basic dot signal duration. All Morse code (symbols) information is then seen to be composed of unique sequences of these three basic elements, namely: the dot signal, the dash signal, and the silent period; the time extent of each of these three basic elements being measured in terms of the dot duration. The ubiquitous silent periods or off periods that always occur between Morse signals represent the most important characteristic of Morse code utilized opportunistically by QSK or full break-in operation to facilitate fluid Morse code conversations.
Symbols
In contrast to the short dot and dash signals and their ever present adjacent dot duration silent periods, Morse code symbols are of longer duration than signals and are composed of unique dot/dash sequences of Morse signals and silent periods. Morse code symbols are separated from each other by at least a three dot duration inter-symbol silent period. Morse code symbols represent alpha-numeric, punctuation and prosign characters. Each such long duration symbol consists of a unique sequence of two or more of the three basic elements (dot, dash, silent period), e.g. the unique sequence for the English letter "C" is ( — · — ·). Each unique symbol represents either: (i) a unique alpha-numeric character (e.g. letters A-Z and numerals 0-9), (ii) a unique punctuation character (e.g. ? or @, etc.), or (iii) a unique procedural symbol.
Code groups (words)
Words or code groups are composed of a sequence of symbols. Each word or code group is then separated from other words or code groups by a silent period of at least five dot durations. Sentences are strings of words or code groups which are also separated from other sentences by a silent period of at least five dot durations.
Silent periods between: signals, symbols and code groups
Silent periods are the most important Morse code element for supporting full break-in or QSK operation. The Morse code silent periods of approximately: one dot duration between Morse code signals, three dot durations between symbols, and five dot durations between words or code groups and sentences provide operators with: mid-symbol, mid-word and mid-sentence, opportunities to interrupt or break-in on transmitting operators. These silent periods between signals, symbols and words also provide the sending operator with opportunities to listen for interruptions from receiving stations.
The mid-symbol listening and interruption capability provided by the short but ubiquitous Morse code silent periods during QSK or full break-in operation on half-duplex radiotelegraph channels creates the illusion of apparent continuous two-way contact allowing radiotelegraph operators to feel as if they are sharing a full duplex channel.
QSK transmit/receive (T/R) switch operation
QSK operation is a technique where very fast T/R RF switches are controlled automatically and directly by the actions of the telegraph key upon which the sending operator is creating the Morse code signals. In QSK operation the T/R switches are capable of automatically and rapidly switching the radio antenna or antennas between the transmitter and receiver during the short (dot duration) silent periods between Morse code signals. Such fast robust analog radio frequency T/R switches automatically controlled by the operator's telegraph key generally have stringent (timing, reliability, and power handling) specifications and are quite expensive.
QSK hardware switch equipped sending stations can be interrupted mid-symbol (mid-character) by receiving stations during the dot duration silent periods between the sending station's signals. A properly QSK equipped station can be interrupted in the middle of sending most single Morse code alpha-numeric characters, punctuation symbols and prosign symbols which requires, generally speaking, a shorter time period than a single syllable of spoken language. Receiving operators may thus break-in on QSK operators mid-symbol at any time; the only exceptions being the single signal Morse code symbols namely: single dot, for letter E, and single dash, for letter T. QSK operation enables a fluid conversational style of Morse code communication based upon the ability of a receiving operator to interrupt a QSK equipped sender mid-character creating the illusion of a conversational style similar to normal human voice conversations.
Although simple in concept, the detailed design of the hardware RF T/R switches and the mechanisms to allow automatic control of the T/R switches for QSK operation from the actions of the associated telegraph key is a non-trivial engineering exercise and necessarily involves somewhat more expensive componentry than found in stations without full break-in capability. These design difficulties and stringent requirements are due to factors such as: the vast signal ranges encountered by the switches, switch power handling requirements, switch speed requirements, switch reliability requirements, and receiver gain control recovery speed requirements, all of which are briefly outlined in following paragraphs.
Full break-in or QSK operation
Full break-in or QSK operation,[1][2][3] is a hardware supported Morse code communications channel turn over communications protocol. Full break-in is a so-called duplexing protocol, that facilitates a style of two-way Morse code communications on traditional half-duplex radiotelegraph channels that closely simulates full-duplex channel operations similar to the way normal human voice communications proceeds.
With full break-in or QSK operation the fast analog radio frequency hardware antenna change over transmit/receive (T/R) switches are controlled automatically in real time directly by the actions of the telegraph key with which the operator is originating the Morse code information. With radiotelegraph communications, so-called QSK operation enables a fluid style of half-duplex channel control based upon the capability, as provided by the QSK hardware T/R switches, for a receiving operator to interrupt a sending operator in mid-character, during any of the ubiquitous silent periods between Morse code signals, in a manner similar to the way in which normal human voice conversations allow mid-syllable interruption of speakers by listeners.[4]
Semi break-in operation
Semi break-in is a technique used by stations where slow (T/R) antenna switches are controlled indirectly by the telegraph key which lack the faster switching of full break-in stations. Semi break-in hardware T/R switches are not required to switch as fast or to have the same long term reliability as their more expensive full break-in counterparts. Instead of using the telegraph key to directly control antenna switching, semi break-in radio transceiver equipment typically uses the telegraph key to control T/R switches indirectly, but still automatically, by passing the telegraph key information (usually in the form of a keyed audio tone) through a radio transceiver's Voice-operated switch or VOX circuitry.
In this technique, the relatively slow acting VOX circuitry is used to control the T/R switches. Voice-operated switch (VOX) circuitry is designed to be normally activated by human voice audio picked up by the transceiver microphone during voice communications in order to effect antenna change over at a rate no faster than the typical human voice syllabic rate or slower. VOX circuitry usually has a front panel adjustable delay that can be used to control the length of time it takes for T/R switches to operate but generally the delay adjustment range is limited to that of human voice syllables and, although automatic, is generally not fast enough to act in the short periods between Morse code dots and dashes. Receiving stations thus cannot break-in or interrupt semi break-in or VOX controlled Morse code stations in mid-symbol or mid-word, during Morse code operation because the semi break-in sending station simply cannot hear in the short durations between the Morse code signals and words or code groups.
Receiving stations wishing to break-in on semi break-in stations must wait for the longer silent periods between the sending station's words or sentences before attempting to interrupt or break-in. At worst, receiving stations must wait until semi break-in stations explicitly turn over the channel to the receiving station by sending a break prosign. Unlike full break-in operation, semi break-in operation is not fast enough to provide a fluid Morse code conversational capability approximating that of normal human voice conversation.
Although not as fluid and efficient as full break-in, semi break-in or VOX controlled break-in is a better Morse code channel turn over technique than pure manual break-in operation as described in the following paragraph.
Manual break-in operation
Manual break-in is a technique used in a rudimentary Morse code radio station set up where antenna change over (T/R) switches are not controlled by the telegraph key. Instead antenna change over is accomplished manually by mechanical switches separate from the telegraph key on which the operator sends the Morse code. With such a simple manual turn over system there is no possibility of the sending operator listening between signals or symbols and therefore no possibility for the receiving operator to interrupt the sending operator. Instead the receiving operator must wait until a transmitting operator has indicated the end of transmission by means of a turn over prosign and has manually changed the antenna over from transmitter to receiver. Such manual break-in operation leads to a very slow and stilted style of Morse code conversations.
QSK protocols
QSK operation comprises a hardware switch technology and protocol wherein participating Morse code stations are equipped with very fast analog radio frequency T/R switches connecting the transmitter, receiver and antenna. This fast analog hardware switching capability enables a receiving station to interrupt or break-in on a transmitting station in mid-symbol (mid-character), a process known as full break-in. The ability to hear between transmitted signals conferred by fast radio frequency hardware switching only requires Morse code operators to make use of simple communications protocols to manage the channel turn over process. The typical QSK protocol technique is quite simple to learn and to master.
Opening protocol
Since not all Morse code radio stations are equipped for QSK operation, sending stations equipped for QSK operation will often open a Morse conversation by sending the three letter group QSK (e.g. the operator will assert QSK) during an initial (opening) Morse code transmission to alert receiving stations that the sending station has the ability to listen between signals and that the receiving station can interrupt, or break-in, on the sending station at will. Conversely a station may query another Morse code station's QSK capability by sending the QSK signal followed by a question mark. The query QSK? asks if the receiving station has full break-in capability. If a receiving station is equipped for QSK operation the receiving operator will respond to the query QSK? with the assertion QSK indicating that the station has QSK capability. Subsequently the two stations can then utilize the fluid and efficient Morse code conversational QSK protocols outlined in the following paragraphs.
In practice, many skilled operators do not bother to open a conversation with the preliminary opening QSK assertion or QSK query protocols, instead merely attempting to interrupt a sending station by tapping their telegraph key while listening between the signals (dots and dashes) for what happens next. If the sending station pauses when interrupted each party automatically knows the other is using QSK operation and then the two stations immediately start using the following QSK interrupt and turn over protocol with no further ado.
Interrupt protocol
Interruptions or break-ins are initiated by receiving stations momentarily depressing their telegraph key while the sending station is actively sending Morse code, thus generating a short interrupting signal which is heard by the sending station between its own signals. In practice usually only a single dot is required to initiate a break-in.
Turn over protocol
Upon hearing the break-in signal between the dots and dashes being sent, the interrupted station stops sending immediately and either: (a) just pauses momentarily or, (b) sends a single letter K (go ahead) prosign and pauses momentarily, thus turning over the channel to the interrupter, and subsequently listens for the other station during the momentary pause. Highly skilled fluent telegraphists seldom bother to send the K prosign when interrupted instead simply letting the interrupter take over the channel during the pause.
Ongoing channel control protocol
The interrupting station recognizing the momentary sending pause by the sender immediately begins sending its own information to the interrupted station. Meanwhile, the interrupting station continues listening between its own transmitted signals in case of interruption in the reverse direction by the original sender.
These simple full break-in channel turn over protocols literally mimic the conversational style in which people interrupt each other mid-syllable during normal voice conversations. Full break-in QSK T/R switch hardware together with use of the simple QSK protocols enables a fast, efficient, fluid conversational style of Morse code communication.
Signal level range considerations
Enormous signal level ranges must be accommodated by radio transceiver equipment. Transmitter output power for amateur radio stations might typically be 100 Watts (+50dBm) or more, while received power at radio receiver antenna input terminals might typically be as low as -130dBm. This range of signal power that must be handled by various components of the T/R switching hardware encompasses an enormous total power handling range of up to 180dBm (-130 to 50 dBm). This logarithmic measure of range encompasses a signal power ratio of 1 to 1 followed by 18 zeros (1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000)!
Depending upon the Engineering set up, radiotelegraph stations may use either a single antenna for both transmit and receive or, separate transmit and receive antennas. In either case, when receivers are operating on the same or nearby radio frequencies as used by their associated transmitters, while using the same or nearby antennas, the typical radio receiver is thus exposed to extremely large signals from the nearby transmitter. This situation would generally result in the destruction or degradation of the receiver front end circuitry and would be problematic at best and destructive at worst. As of this writing there has yet apparently been no receiver technology developed that can operate with full sensitivity over such a huge range of received signal levels whilst also safely withstanding the high power levels presented by the associated nearby transmitter. And so receiver inputs cannot simply be bridged across transmitting antenna terminals! Receivers must be isolated from the powerful transmitter signals by some means. These means are provided by the so-called T/R switches.
The low level analog front end (AFE) amplifier circuitry of receivers sensitive enough to detect signals at -130dBm levels and below are invariably extremely sensitive to high power levels. Typically, without the protection and isolation provided by T/R switches, the receiver AFE would be overwhelmed or destroyed by the normal transmitter power levels which are in the +50dBm or more range. Consequently, receiver AFE antenna input terminals must be protected. With QSK operation this receiver protection is provided by well designed robust analog hardware T/R switches placed between the receiver AFE circuitry and the radio antenna.
The end result of extreme receiver AFE sensitivity to high power levels is that, for most practical purposes, signal reception is impossible during periods when the associated transmitter is actually transmitting the dot and dash signals. Consequently, radiotelegraph operators cannot hear interruptions from remote receiving stations during normal signal transmission periods when the full transmitter power is applied to the antenna.
To protect receiver circuitry, radiotelegraph channels on nearby frequencies and antennas must operate in so-called half-duplex mode wherein the stations at either end alternate between transmitting and receiving (because e.g. simultaneous transmit and receive is simply not possible). To support two way conversations on half duplex channels, analog radio frequency hardware antenna switches must be provided at each station location to connect and disconnect the transmitters and receivers from their antennas whenever the channel transmission control is turned over from one station to the other.
The aforementioned considerations: (i) prevention of receiver desensitization during transmit periods, (ii) prevention of damage or destruction of receiver AFE input circuitry during transmit periods, (iii) enabling transmitting stations to listen between signals and, (iv) providing efficient, fluid and fluent two way communications on half-duplex radiotelegraph channels, are the four prime motivations and considerations driving the development of radiotelegraph channel full break-in QSK technologies.
Receiver AGC recovery time considerations
Not all radio receivers are amenable to QSK operation.
Adding fast robust T/R switching externally to a transmitter/receiver combination (transceiver) will not necessarily result in good QSK operation. Adding such fast switching externally to a transceiver may create transients within receiver circuitry that makes signal copy: very noisy at best, and difficult, or impossible at worst.
Apart from the requirement for fast robust T/R switches, the main factor affecting good QSK operation is the ability for the radio receiver to recover its sensitivity quickly whilst operating quietly (without popping noises) during and after the fast transient signals created by the fast T/R switch operation. Many receivers have automatic gain control (AGC) circuits with time constants that take many milliseconds to recover their sensitivity and volume level after a strong transient signal is presented to their antenna input port. Without modifications or AGC circuit re-design such receivers are not suitable for QSK operation. In cases of slow responding AGC circuitry operators may accept the thumping noise and loss of AGC functionality and choose to turn their receiver AGC function off, instead operating their receivers using only manual gain control during QSK operation.
Morse code operators aspiring to the convenience and conversational fluency of Morse code QSK operation who plan to add external QSK T/R switches to their existing or planned radio transceiver setups should ensure that their receiver AGC circuitry has recovery times commensurate with the T/R switching transients to be expected and that the AGC circuits can operate quickly in the sub-millisecond range without creating noisy pops and static at the receiver audio output (speaker or headphones). Of particular note is that many of the modern so-called software defined radio (SDR) transceivers have particularly slow AGC functions because of the latency created by the extensive digital signal processing (A/D conversion, D/A conversion, digital filtering, digital modulation and digital demodulation) used for the SDR implementation. For these reasons, generally most SDR radios will not have the capability to operate QSK at the higher speed Morse code rates.
Expensive high end radio transceiver equipment that has been designed and manufactured with integrated QSK capability will generally meet such fast AGC recovery time requirements. Receiver recovery times may however be a potential issue for QSK operators who plan to add external QSK switching to an existing radio equipment set up.
T/R switches: speeds, reliability, and power handling considerations
Full break-in hardware capability requires fast, robust, high power, analog, radio frequency (RF) transmit/receive (T/R) switches or RF switches capable of operating in sub-millisecond response times over long periods of continuous operation while handling the high radio frequency power of the transmitter. Some high-end manufactured radio transceiver equipment contains integrated (factory installed) QSK switching hardware while in other cases external QSK switching hardware or commercial switching products may be added to existing non-QSK capable equipment.[5]
Switching speeds
As an example illustrating switching speeds or timing requirements consider that when sending Morse code at a 20 word per minute rate the typical dot signal duration is a mere 50 milliseconds. To enable good quality QSK operation the switching hardware must switch the radio antenna from receiver to transmitter in much less than one tenth of the dot duration. At 20 word per minute code speed this means that QSK T/R switching times must be in the range of 1 to 1/2 millisecond or below. Even smaller sub-millisecond times are required with higher speed Morse code transmissions.
Long term reliability
The dotting rate of Morse code is the reciprocal of the dot duration, e.g. at twenty words per minute based upon the standard word PARIS with a dot duration of 50 milliseconds, the dotting rate is twenty times per second (20 = 1.0/0.05). The dotting rate is even faster for higher speed Morse code. For long time reliability QSK T/R switches must be robust enough to open and close at least at a dotting rate of twenty times per second or even higher over thousands of hours of operation.
Power handling
T/R switches must operate reliably at high dotting rates over many thousands of hours enabling the reception of extremely low level signals between dots and dashes while handling very high radio transmitter power levels of hundreds to thousands of Watts. Such robust high power analog radio frequency high speed switches are not inexpensive.
T/R switch technologies
Examples of radio frequency analog hardware switch or RF switch technologies are: high voltage vacuum relays[6] or high power semiconductor PIN diode switches. In recent times, as PIN diode power handling capabilities have been improved by the semiconductor industry, PIN diodes have largely supplanted vacuum relays in the QSK switch function because the absence of moving parts in PIN diode semiconductor devices results in: higher speeds, higher reliability and longer lifetimes. [7][8]
Switching hardware technologies that can handle the radio frequency currents of high power transmitters and also switch quietly at these high Morse code rates over long periods of time are difficult to design and quite expensive to manufacture. Mechanical switches or relays are the most problematic and least reliable and must be protected from arcs (sparking) usually by operating in a vacuum enclosure with elaborate timing circuitry. Not all radio transceiver equipment provides the costly high speed analog transmit/receive (T/R) radio frequency switching hardware support necessary for QSK full break-in operation. Generally full break-in is available only on more expensive radio transceivers. Radiotelegraphers who aspire to the fluency of Morse code QSK operation must ensure that their radio equipment includes the hardware capability for radio frequency antenna switching that operates rapidly enough to allow listening between signals at the appropriate Morse code sending speeds with appropriate lifetimes and reliability.
See also
- AGC
- Amateur radio
- Analog front-end (AFE)
- Automatic gain control
- Communications channel
- Communications protocol
- Continuous wave
- dBm
- Duplex (telecommunications)
- full-duplex
- half-duplex
- Morse code
- On-off keying
- OOK
- PIN diode
- Prosigns for Morse code
- Q code
- QST Magazine
- RF switch
- Simplex communication
- Radiotelegraph
- Vacuum relay
- Telegraphists/Telegraphers
- Telegraph key
- Unipolar encoding
- Voice operated switch (VOX)
- VOX
- Wireless telegraphy
References
- ↑ Silver, N0AX, H. Ward, Editor (2013). The ARRL Handbook For Radio Communications 2014 (91 ed.). Newington, CT: American Radio Relay League, Inc. pp. 13–9. ISBN 978-1-62595-000-0.
- ↑ Biddulph, G8DPS, Editor, Dick (1995). Radio Communication Handbook (6 ed.). Potters Bar, Herts: Radio Society of Great Britain. pp. 7–28. ISBN 1 872309 24 0.
- ↑ Sheller, KN8Z, J. R. (July 1985). "What Does QSK Really Mean?". QST (7): 31.
- ↑ Shafer, W4AX, David P. (Feb 1979). "Why QSK?". QST (2): 53.
- ↑ Hansen, VE7CA, Markus. "Perfecting a QSK System" (PDF). ARRL. Retrieved 16 March 2016.
- ↑ Technology, Jennings. "Vacuum RF Switching". Jennings Technology.
- ↑ Garland, W8ZR, James C. "Add Full Break-In QSK Keying to your Linear Amplifier" (PDF). w8zr.net. w8zr. Retrieved 8 March 2016.
- ↑ Ameritron. "QSK-5 Manual" (PDF). Ameritron. Retrieved 9 March 2016.