Schiaparelli EDM lander

Schiaparelli EDM lander

Model of Schiaparelli lander at ESOC (2016)
Mission type Mars lander / technology demonstrator
Operator ESA · Roscosmos
COSPAR ID 2016-017A
SATCAT № 41388
Website ESA Mission WebSite
Mission duration Planned: 2 to 8 sols[1] (surface stay)
Preceded by 3 day coast between separation and entry[2]
Spacecraft properties
Manufacturer Thales Alenia Space
Launch mass 577 kg (1,272 lb)[3]
Dimensions Diameter: 2.4 m (7.9 ft)[3]
Height: 1.8 m (5.9 ft)[3]
Start of mission
Launch date 14 March 2016, 09:31 (2016-03-14UTC09:31) UTC
Rocket Proton-M/Briz-M
Launch site Baikonur Site 200/39
Contractor Khrunichev
End of mission
Disposal Crash-landed
Destroyed 19 October 2016 (2016-10-20)
Landing site

Meridiani Planum, Mars


2°04′S 6°13′W / 2.07°S 6.21°W / -2.07; -6.21 (Schiaparelli EDM lander crash site)


ESA mission insignia for the ExoMars 2016 launch, featuring the Trace Gas Orbiter (left) and Schiaparelli (right).


ExoMars programme
2020 ExoMars rover
and surface platform

Schiaparelli EDM lander [skjapaˈɾɛlːi] was the Entry, Descent and Landing Demonstrator Module (EDM) of the ExoMars programme—a joint mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Russian space agency Roscosmos.[4] It was built in Italy and was intended to test technology for future soft landings on the surface of Mars.[5] It also had a limited but focused science payload that would have measured atmospheric electricity on Mars and local meteorological conditions.[2][6][7] As part of the Aurora program the ESA was considering participating in a human Mars mission as early as 2030, in 2005.[8]

It was launched together with the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO) on 14 March 2016 and attempted a landing on 19 October 2016. Telemetry signals from Schiaparelli, monitored in real time by the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope in India, were lost about one minute from the surface during the final landing stages.[9] On 21 October 2016, NASA released an image by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter showing what appears to be the lander's crash site.[10] The telemetry data accumulated by the TGO and ESA's Mars Express orbiters are being used to investigate the failure modes of the landing technology employed.

Namesake

A marble gravestone on the wall of a crypt
Schiaparelli's grave in Milan, Italy

The Schiaparelli Entry, Descent, and Landing Demonstrator module is named for Giovanni Schiaparelli (1835–1910), an astronomer active in the 19th century who made Mars observations.[11] In particular, he recorded features he called canali in his native Italian.[11] His observations of what translates as channels in English inspired many.[11] The dark streaks on Mars are an albedo feature which is related to dust distribution; these albedo features on Mars slowly change over time, and in the last few decades have been monitored by Mars orbiters.[12] Schiaparelli is famous for making hand-drawn maps of Mars during its 1877 oppositions with Earth with an optical refracting telescope.[4] He was also the first astronomer to determine the relationship between comet debris and yearly meteor showers.[4]

Other things named for Schiaparelli include the main-belt asteroid 4062 Schiaparelli,[13] named on 15 September 1989 (M.P.C. 15090),[14] the lunar crater Schiaparelli,[13] the Martian crater Schiaparelli,[13] Schiaparelli Dorsum on Mercury,[15] and the 2016 ExoMars EDM lander.[4]

The mission was named in November 2013, previously it was known as the Exomars Entry, descent and landing Demonstrator Module, or ExoMars EDM for short.[4] Another name was ExoMars static lander, however some designs for what was the static lander are quite different due to various stages of design and program restructioning.[16] Another name, especially for both orbiter and lander together is ExoMars 2016.[17]

Origins & development

This space art, titled The Next Stop was selected by the ESA when discussing its Aurora flagship ExoMars program, and features people enduring a Mars dust storm near a manned Mars rover.[18][19]
Models of Schiaparelli and the ExoMars rover at ESA ESTEC, 2014

The EDM traces itself back to the ESA Aurora programme, which has the goal of human exploration of space, and thus producing missions that are building blocks to support this goal.[20] ExoMars originated out of this, and provides context for understanding the EDM.[20] Schiaparelli forms an important "block" of learning how to land heavy payloads on Mars, which is vital to future manned missions.[20] Another "block" is the ExoMars rover, which is intended to demonstrate among other things the ability to traverse several km/miles on the surface of Mars.[20] The Aurora program is focused on two types of the mission, one are larger flagship spacecraft and the other are smaller missions specifically meant to offload risk from the larger missions.[21] There is also various science goals:

The ExoMars scientific objectives are: the search for traces of past and present life; the characterization of the water/geochemical environment as a function of depth in the shallow subsurface; the study of the surface environment and identification of hazards to future human missions; and finally, the investigation of the planet’s subsurface and deep interior, to better understand the evolution and habitability of Mars.
The ExoMars Rover - Overview of Phase B1 Results, 2008[22]

An important date in its development was 2005, when the ESA council approved 650 million Euros for a Mars rover and static lander.[23] At this time the idea was for a single launch bringing both a Mars Exploration Rover class rover and instrumented static lander to Mars with a simpler cruise stage;in this case the static lander both landed the rover and performed its own studies.[20][23] However to accomplish its mission goals, the spacecraft gained mass especially the rover which at one point was budgeted for 6 kg.[23] This led to the search for bigger rockets; the Ariane V, Atlas V, and Proton were evaulated.[23] Another factor was if the demonstrator should wait in Mars orbit for the Global dust storm to start.[23] Early in the development, the idea was for the lander to be carried by a dedicated cruise stage called the Carrier Module.[24] Eventually, the Trace Gas Orbiter mission was merged into ExoMars becoming the mother-ship for the EDM.[23]

An older iteration of the static lander was planned to carry a group of eleven instruments collectively called the "Humboldt payload",[25] that would be dedicated to investigate the geophysics of the deep interior. But a payload confirmation review in the first quarter of 2009 resulted in a severe de-scope of the lander's instruments, and the Humboldt suite was cancelled.[26] Notional instruments in the Humboldt payload included a sub-surface radar, meteorological instruments, and the geophysical instruments.[27]

Overview

The data obtained from Schiaparelli are expected to provide ESA and Roscomos with the technology for landing on the surface of Mars with a controlled soft landing, key technologies for the 2020 ExoMars rover mission.[3]

Pre-launch

The 577 kg (1,272 lb) descent module Schiaparelli and orbiter completed testing and were integrated to a Proton-M rocket at the Baikonur cosmodrome in Baikonur in mid-January 2016.[28] TGO and EDM arrived at Baikonur in December 2015.[23] In February the spacecraft was mounted to the Briz-M upper stage, and in early March that was attached to the Proton rocket.[23]

Liftoff

The launch occurred at 09:31 GMT (15:31 local time) on 14 March 2016.[29] Four rocket burns occurred in the following 10 hours before the descent module and orbiter were released.[30] A signal from the orbiter was received at 21:29 GMT that day, confirming that the launch was successful and the spacecraft was functioning properly.[31] Shortly after separation from the probes, the Briz-M upper booster stage exploded a few kilometres away, without damaging the orbiter or lander.[32]

Liftoff for ExoMars 2016 carrying the Schiaparelli demonstrator

Cruise and separation

After its launch, the Trace Gas Orbiter and EDM traveled together coasting through space towards Mars.[33] During this time the EDM was powered from an umbilical power line to the TGO, thus preserving the EDM's limited internal batteries.[33] On 14 October 2016, the TGO did a final adjustment to its trajectory before the separation of Schiaparelli.[34] The launch mass of the two spacecraft together is 4332 kg including the 600 kg Schiaparelli module.[35] This was the heaviest spacecraft yet sent to Mars.[36] The journey from Earth to Mars in 2016 took about 7 months.[36]

On 16 October 2016, the TGO and EDM separated, the orbiter heading for Mars orbit insertion and the EDM for Mars atmospheric entry.[33][37] Prior to the separation, the EDM was spun up 2.5 RPM (see also spin stabilization) and then released at a velocity of about 1 km/h relative to TGO.[38] The EDM was designed to go into a lower-power hibernation mode for about 3 days while it traveled solo to Mars.[33] The EDM came out of hibernation about and hour and half prior to reaching the Martian atmosphere.[33] Meanwhile, after the separation, the TGO adjusted its trajectory for its Mars orbit insertion and by 19 October 2016 performed a 139-minute rocket engine burn to enter Mars orbit.[34] On the same day, the Schiaparelli module arrived at Mars traveling at 21,000 km/h (13,000 mph; 5.8 km/s) and engaged in its prime task of entry, descent, and landing.[39] It used a heat shield, parachute and retrorockets to slow its descent. Meanwhile, the TGO (orbiter) entered Mars' orbit and it will undergo several months of aerobraking to adjust its speed and orbit, with science activities beginning in late 2017.[39] The TGO will continue serving as a relay satellite for future Mars landing missions until 2022.[40]

Landing site

View of Meridiani Planum by the Opportunity rover in 2004, an area favored by probe landings for its smooth dunes and mostly boulder-free plains.[41]
Another view of Meridiani Planum by the Opportunity rover. Bopolu crater rim is in the distance, also south of the Schiaparelli landing zone

The landing site chosen was Meridiani Planum, a Martian plain prized by Mars landers for its flat terrain and low elevation that gives a spacecraft time and distance to slow down before reaching the ground.[42] The EDM cannot avoid obstacles during its descent, so it was important to pick a large flat area with a minimum of obstacles.[41] The landing ellipse is about 100 km long by 15 km wide, centered at 6° West and 2° South running East-West, with the eastern edge including the Opportunity rover landing site, and near Endeavour crater where it was still operating when the EDM was launched and when it attempted to land.[43] The Opportunity rover (MER-B) landing site is called the Challenger Memorial Station.[44] It was also thought that the EDM would have a chance of arriving when Mars experienced its global dust storms, and thus gain knowledge about the atmosphere under these less common conditions.[43] The site is also known to be scientifically interesting; The Opportunity rover discovered a type of iron mineral that forms in the presence of water, so it is theorized there was a significant amount of water there in the past.[41]

The red star denotes the planned landing site for the ExoMars Schiaparelli EDM lander: Meridiani Planum, close to where the Opportunity rover landed in 2004.

Dust storm goal

The landing was planned to take place on Meridiani Planum[3] during the dust storm season, which would have provided a chance to characterise a dust-loaded atmosphere during entry and descent, measure the dust's static electricity charge —typically produced by friction— and to conduct surface measurements associated with a dust-rich environment.[45]

Time-lapse composite of the Martian horizon over 30 Martian days shows how much sunlight the July 2007 dust storms blocked; Tau of 4.7 indicates 99% sunlight blocked.

Global dust storms have occurred at least nine times since 1924 including 1977, 1982, 1994, 2001 and 2007; the 2007 dust storms nearly ended the functioning of the solar-powered U.S. Mars Exploration Rovers Spirit and Opportunity.[46] Global dust storms obscured Mars when the Mariner 9 orbiter arrived there in 1971, and it took several weeks for the dust to settle down and allow for clear imaging of the surface of Mars.[47] It was predicted that Mars global dust storms are likely to occur in the fall of 2016, but they had not started when the EDM attempted its landing.[46]

Entry, descent, and landing events sequence

Here is a Mars lander during the parachute phase of its descent. Schiaparelli was designed to deploy its parachute at 11 km above Mars.[48]
Here is an example of a Mars lander ejecting its heat shield over Mars. Schiaparelli was designed to eject its lower heat shield at an altitude of 7 km above Mars.[2]
Depiction of the EDM during the rocket-assisted descent portion of its Mars landing

The Schiaparelli lander separated from the TGO orbiter on 16 October 2016, three days before arrival at Mars, and entered the atmosphere at 21,000 km/h (13,000 mph; 5.8 km/s) on 19 October 2016.[39] (see also Mars atmospheric entry) When the lander disconnected from the orbiter, it switched to internal battery power and used a low-power hibernation mode while it coasted for three days just before entering the Martian atmosphere.[2] Schiaparelli came out of hibernation several hours before its entry, at a speed of 21,000 km/h (about 13,000 mph) and an altitude of 122.5 km above the surface of Mars.[2] The head shield was used during the plunge into the atmosphere to decelerate the lander to 1650 km/h (about 1000 mph) by the time it reached 11 km altitude.[49] During entry the COMARS+ instrumentation the EDM operated to collect data on how heat and air flow around the entry capsule.[50]

After slowing its initial entry through the atmosphere, the module deployed a parachute and was to complete its landing on retrorockets by using a closed-loop guidance, navigation and control system based on a Doppler radar altimeter sensor, and on-board inertial measurement units. Throughout the descent, various sensors recorded a number of atmospheric parameters and lander performance.[51] The plan was at 7 km in altitude the front heat shield would be jettisoned and the radar altimeter turned on, then at 1.3 km altitude above Mars the rear heat cover and parachute would be jettisoned.[49]

The final stages of the landing were to be performed using pulse-firing liquid-fuel engines or retrorockets. About two metres above ground, the engines were designed to turn off and let the platform land on a crushable structure, designed to deform and absorb the final touchdown impact.[3][51] On final landing it was designed to endure rocks about one foot high, and it was hoped, but not guaranteed, that no out-sized boulders or craters would be encountered.[52] On final contact, the lander was designed to handle slopes of up to 19 degrees and rocks up to 38 cm height (14 inches).[53]

The Opportunity rover was operating in the region and the two teams worked together to attempt to image the EDM on its descent, which depending on conditions might be possible especially if the EDM "went long" in its landing ellipse. However, the rover attempting to image the lander during its descent was reported to not have viewed the lander, according to early analysis.[54][55] It was the first time one probed attempted the image another probe landing from the surface of Mars.[55] (other probes have imaged each other, especially orbiters viewing ones on the ground, and in 2005 Mars Global Survery imaged Mars Express in orbit around Mars.[56])

EDL summary (as planned):[57]

Contact was lost with the module 50 seconds before the planned touch-down.[58] By October 21, 2016 the ESA in studying the data said it was likely that things went wrong when the parachute released early, the engines then turned on but turned off after a too short of time.[58]

Crash

The Schiaparelli lander attempted an automated landing on 19 October 2016, but the signal was lost unexpectedly a short time before the planned time of the landing.[9][59] ESA's Mars Express and NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) and MAVEN listened for the lander's signal.[9] Initial analysis of returned telemetry data (600 megabytes[60]) suggests that the heat shield and parachute deployment worked as expected, but the parachute was released too soon. In addition, the subsequent rocket thrusters' firing lasted about 3 seconds instead of the expected 30 seconds, ceasing operations while the lander was still 2–4 km above the surface, likely impacting the Martian surface at near terminal velocity.[61][62]

MRO Context Camera images of Schiaparelli landing site; before (29 May 2016) and after (20 October 2016). The large black spot indicates the impact by the lander, and the white spot its parachute.[63]

A day after the attempted landing, the Context Camera of NASA's MRO identified new ground markings due to the lander's impact and parachute.[64] The crash site is about 54 kilometers (~33.5 miles) from where the active NASA Mars rover Opportunity was at the time of the landing.[65] On October 27, 2016, ESA released high resolution images of the crash site taken by the MRO HiRISE camera on October 25, 2016.[66][67] The front heatshield, module impact site, and the rear heat-shield and parachute are identified.[66] It is thought that the crater is about half a meter (yard) deep and it may be possible to further study this crater at a later time.[66] On a related note, an artificially made crater was actually the goal of the THOR mission proposed under the Mars Scout program that produced Phoenix and MAVEN, the goal was sub-surface exavation.[68] As it was the mission was passed over, but another orbiter was able to discover naturally occurring fresh impact craters, and ice was found in them.[69]

MRO HiRISE image of Schiaparelli impact area taken on 25 October 2016. Blown up in the images are areas identified as lander impact (center left), front heat shield impact (upper right), and parachute and rear heat shield (lower left)
EDL Demonstration Module[70]
Task Evaluation
separation manoeuvre Yes
hibernation on/off Yes
hypersonic atmospheric entry Yes
parachute deployed Yes
bottom heat shield ejected Yes
parachute ejection Premature[71]
Retro rockets turn-onYes
Retro rockets turn-offToo soon

Although the lander crashed, ESA officials declared Schiaparelli a success because it had fulfilled its primary function of testing the landing system for the ExoMars 2020 surface platform and returning telemetry data during its descent.[59][72] By 20 October, the bulk of the descent data had been returned to Earth and was being analysed.[61] Early reports suggested that the parachute was ejected too soon and that the retro-rockets were turned on, but turned off too soon leading to the module striking Mars at too high a velocity.[71] Unlike Beagle 2, which was not heard from again after being released from Mars Express in 2003, the Exomars module transmitted during descent so data collected and transmitted on the way down was not lost if the spacecraft was destroyed on impact.[71]

Early analysis of the module's crash site suggested that a fuel tank may have exploded asymmetrically in the impact.[66] It is reported that the lander impacted the surface at about 300 kph (83 meters per second, or 186 miles per hour).[73] Additional imaging of the site by November further confirmed the identity of the spacecraft's parts.[74] The additional imaging was in colour and it was noted that parachute was slightly shifted.[74]

HiRise November 1, 2016 observations of the crash site, detailing what is believed to be the main spacecrafts impact location, the lower heat shield, and upper heat shield and parachute.[75] With this second observation, it is noted that wind seems to have shifted the parachute, and some of bright spots around the crash zone were confirmed to be from material not image noise or momentary reflections.[75]

By taking more images using a technique called SRR the resolution can be improved, and this was done for the formerly lost Beagle 2 probe.[76] Two other benefits to more images is that is easier to discern between image noise such as cosmic ray hits and real objects, and among bright spots high albedo objects versus momentary specular reflections.[75] Finally, with multiple images over time, movement and changes, such as the wind blowing a parachute can be observed.[75]

ESA investigation has found that during the descent the parachute deployed normally at an altitude of 12 km and a speed of 1730 km/h. The heat shield was released as expected at an altitude of 7.8 km. The doppler radar has started to work as expected, but the lander's inertial measurement unit worked for one second more than expected and went into saturation. As a result the navigation algorithm has calculated the altitude as on the ground or under the ground, causing the premature shutdown of the spacecraft's engines. In reality the lander was still 3.7 kilometers above the surface.[77]

Instrument and sensor payload

Concordia research station is another mission that supports development of an ESA human mission to Mars, supporting the Aurora Exploration Programme.[8] Atmospheric electricity is one of the concerns for a human missions to Mars and Schiaparelli might have provided the first ever measurement of this property on Mars.[6][49]

The primary mission goal was to test the landing systems, including the parachute, Doppler radar altimeter, hydrazine thrusters, etc.[78] The secondary mission goal was scientific. The lander was to measure the wind speed and direction, humidity, pressure and surface temperature, and determine the transparency of the atmosphere.[45] The surface science payload was called DREAMS, and was designed to conduct meteorological data for a few days after landing,[79] as well as measure the first measurements of atmospheric static electricity on Mars.[6][49]

A descent camera (DECA) was included in the payload.[49] Its captured images were to be transmitted after landing.[2] AMELIA, COMARS+, and DECA collected data during the entry, descent, and landing for about six minutes.[3] Much of this data was transmitted while it was descending.[80] Although EDL portion was designed to last literally a few minutes, and the surface observations at most a few days, one instrument, INRRI, was a passive laser retro-reflector that could be used as long as possible, even decades later, for laser range-finding of the lander.[81]

INRRI was mounted to the top (zenith) side of the lander, to enable spacecraft above to target it.[82] It weighed about 25 grams on Earth, and was contributed by the Italian Space Agency (ASI).[83] The design used a cube corner reflector to return incoming laser light.[84] The cubes are made of fused silica which are mounted to an aluminum support structure.[85]

Summary of the science-technology payload
[3][78]

DREAMS

This artist's concept illustrates an electrically active dust storm on Mars, which may have produced chemicals that caused the inconclusive Viking lander life-detection experiment results.[87] Schiaparelli was aiming to measure atmospheric electricity during the Mars dust storm season.[49]
Martian dust devils have also been theorized as having electric fields.[88] This one captured in April 2016 in Endeavour crater, nearby to the Schiaparelli landing zone
This is an animated GIF of a dust devil on Mars
The Phoenix lander took these measurements of atmospheric dust with LIDAR in 2008

The lander's scientific payload for the surface was the meteorological DREAMS (Dust Characterization, Risk Assessment, and Environment Analyser on the Martian Surface) package, consisting of a suite of sensors to measure the wind speed and direction (MetWind), humidity (MetHumi), pressure (MetBaro), surface temperature (MarsTem), the transparency of the atmosphere (Solar Irradiance Sensor - SIS), and atmospheric electrification (Atmospheric Relaxation and Electric-field Sensor - Micro-ARES).[79][89] The institutions that contributed to the DREAMS science payload include INAF and CISAS from Italy, LATMOS from France, ESTEC from the Netherlands, FMI from Finland, and INTA from Spain.[90]

The DREAMS payload was intended to function for 2 to 8 Mars days as an environmental station for the duration of the surface mission after landing.[3][51] The planned lander arrival was made to coincide with the Mars global dust storm season and collect data on a dust-loaded Mars atmosphere.[45] DREAMS had been hoped to provide new insights into the role of electric forces on dust lifting, the mechanism that initiates dust storms. In addition, the MetHumi sensor was intended to complement MicroARES measurements with critical data about humidity, to enable scientists to better understand the dust electrification process.[89]

Atmospheric electricity on Mars is still unmeasured, and its possible role in dust storms and atmospheric chemistry remains. It has been speculated that atmospheric static electricity may have played a role in the inconclusive results from the Viking lander life experiments, which were positive for metabolizing microbial life, but no organic compounds were detected by the mass spectrometer.[87] The two favored possible explanations are reactions with hydrogen peroxide (O2H2) or ozone (O3) created by ultraviolet light or atmospheric electrical processes during dust storms.[87]

DREAMS-P was a pressure sensor and DREAMS-H was for humidity;the sensors feed a single data-handling circuit board.[91]

In addition to the surface payload, a camera called DECA (Descent Camera) on the lander operated during the descent. It was intended to deliver additional context information and exact location data in the form of images.[92] DECA is a reflight of the Visual Monitoring Camera (VMC) of the Planck and Herschel mission.[93]

Another surface experiment that was focused on dust was the Materials Adherence Experiment on the Mars Pathfinder lander, about twenty years prior to ExoMars.

Descent Camera

The Descent Camera (DECA) was intended to capture about 15 downward-looking views as it approached the surface of Mars.[93] It was to begin acquiring images after the lower heat shield was ejected.[94] This camera had a 60 degree field of view to capture greyscale images, to support technical knowledge of the descent.[93] DECA was a flight spare of the visual monitoring camera of the Herschel Space Observatory and Plank mission that were launched together. The camera dimensions are 9 cm (3.5 in) squared, with a mass of 0.6 kg (1.3 lb).[1] The DECA descent camera data were stored during descent and not meant to be relayed to Earth until after landing,[2] so these images were lost in the crash. The purpose of this transfer delay was to protect the spacecraft and data from electrostatic discharges.[94] DECA wad designed and built in Belgium by Optique et Instruments de Précision (OIP).[2]

The main goals for DECA included:[2]

Preliminary results

Because the Schiarapelli demonstrator lander transmitted during its descent, a great deal of telemetry was successfully returned.[95] About 600 megabytes[60] of data, amounting to about 80% of telemetry, were relayed to Earth and are being used to investigate the failure modes of the landing technology employed.[72][96][97]

Specifications

Note about masses: on the Mars surface the gravity is less than on Earth, so the weight is 37% less than the Earth weight.[98]

Diameter 2.4 m (7.9 ft) with heatshield[3]
1.65 m (5.4 ft) without heatshield
Height 1.8 m (5.9 ft)
Mass[99] 577 kg (1,272 lb) total

280 kg (620 lb) surface component
45 kg (99 lb) hydrazine
80 kg (180 lb) heat shield
20 kg (44 lb) rear heat shield[100]

Heat shield material Norcoat Liège
Structure Aluminium sandwich with carbon fiber reinforced polymer skins
Parachute Disk-gap-band canopy, 12 m (39 ft) diameter
Propulsion 3 clusters of 3 hydrazine pulse engines, 400 N (90 lbf) each

Astrium CHT-400 rocket engines[99]

Power Non-rechargeable battery
Communications UHF link with the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter or other compatible communication systems.[101]
This diagram compares the Trace Gas Orbiter with Schiaparelli EDM attached in its entry cone with the Mars Express orbiter.

Power systems

At one point, Roscosmos offered to contribute a 100 watt radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) power source for the EDM lander to allow it to monitor the local surface environment for a full Martian year,[102][103] but because of complex Russian export control procedures, it later opted for the use of a non-rechargeable electric battery with enough power for 2 to 8 sols.[1][104] Solar panels were also considered when a longer mission (1–2 months) supported by a heavier, more complex, lander was under consideration.[105] By the 2010s the focus was on executing a short-lived (a few days surface time) technology demonstration, with an emphasis on landing systems.[106]

Schiaparelli is unusual by carrying only non-rechargeable batteries, so its active life will be limited to only a few Martian days. This is because its primary objective is to demonstrate entry, descent and landing technologies.

ESA, 2016[48]

Communication systems and network

Schiaparelli had a UHF radio to communicate with Mars orbiters.[101] The lander had two antennae, one on the back shell and one on the lander.[101] When the back shell is ejected, it can transmit from the spiral antenna on body of the lander.[101] The ExoMars TGO could also communicate with it using the UHF system.[101] When an orbiter can communicate with the lander depends on where it is in its orbit, and not all orbiters could record or talk with lander because the globe of Mars blocks the line of sight to the lander.[101] The ExoMars TGO could also communicate with it using the UHF system.[101] The EDM "woke up" from hibernation about 90 minutes prior to landing, and transmitted continuously for 15 minutes prior to landing.[101]

During its landing, the EDM signal was monitored at Mars by the Mars Express orbiter, and remotely by the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope in Pune, India.[101] Mars Express also communicates with other landers and rovers using its Melacom communication system.[101] The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) overflew the landing two hours after landing, and was available to check for signals from Schiaparelli.[101] The ExoMars TGO could also communicate with it using the UHF system.[101]

The communication system standard at Mars is the Electra radio, in use since the arrival of the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter in 2006. Prior to this, several orbiters used a first generation UHF relay system, including Mars Global Surveyor, Mars Odyssey, and Mars Express.[101] Using orbiters to relay data from Mars landers and rovers is noted for its energy efficiency.[107]

On October 19, 2016 it took 9 minutes and 47 seconds for a radio transmission to travel at roughly the speed of light from Mars to Earth. [108] So even though the radio array at Pune listened in "real time", the entire EDL sequence, which would take about 6 minutes, had already occurred even as it was being recorded as starting to enter the atmosphere. [109] There is a tiny bit of variation because the speed of light is slowed down by the air of Mars and Earth (see Refractive index), and another factor is Time dilation, because the probe existed at a significantly different velocity and in a different gravitational field the radio station back on Earth (though relatively small).[110][111][112]

On spaceships, map-clocks may look unsynchronized.

Computing

The Schiaparelli lander has two main computers, one is called the Central Terminal & Power Unit(CTPU) and housed in a warm box on top, and the other computer is called the Remote Terminal & Power Unit (RTPU) and is on the underside of the lander.[113] Overall, the CTPU handles surface operations and the RTPU handles entry and descent, and is actually destroyed on final landing with surface because it is on the underside.[113] When the Trace Gas Orbiter and Entry Demonstrator Module are connected, the RTPU handles the interface and sends power from the orbiter to the module(it is powered by the orbiter not batteries while connected).[113] When it disconnects from the orbiter, then it must run off its internal batteries.[113] The CTPU uses a LEON central processor, and also has RAM, PROM, and a timer.[113] The CTPU also handles data sent to the UHF radio communication system.[113] When the lander disconnects from the orbiter, it spends most of its time in a low-power hibernation mode while it coasts through space before entering the Martian atmosphere.[2] The lander must coast through space for about 3 days by itself before landing, meanwhile the orbiter has to do a Mars Orbit Insertion.[2] The DECA descent camera data is not downloaded to the computer for relay to Earth until after landing (it is not transmitted during descent).[2]

Parachute

A disk-band-gap parachute was deployed by a pyrotechnic mortar.[99] It was tested at full scale in the largest wind tunnel in the world as part of its development.[99] A sub-scale parachute was tested in Earth's atmosphere was conducted in 2011; it was ascended by balloon to 24.5 kilometers altitude and then released, and the pyrotechnic deployment systems was tested after a period of free-fall.[114] On October 19, 2016 the parachute was successfully deployed on Mars.[66]

Retro-rockets

Schiaparelli module has 3 sets of three thrusters, nine total, that operate starting at about 1 km (half a mile) up in pulse mode, slowing the spacecraft from 70 m/s (252 km/h) to 4 m/s (14 km/h).[115] Each of the nine engines is a CHT-400 rocket engine that can produce 400 Newtons of thrust.[115] These rocket engines are fueled by three spherical 17.5 liter tanks holding hydrazine propellant.[115][116] The tanks hold about 15-16 kilograms of hydrazine (about 34 pounds, 2.4 stones) of fuel per tank, or 46 kg overall (101 pounds or 7.24 stones).[115][117] The propellant is pressurized by helium, held in a single tank containing 15.6 liters at a pressure of 170 bar (2465 psi).[118] The thrusters shut down 1–2 meters/yards from the surface, after which the crumple zone underneath the lander handles the final stop.[115] Data from a timer, doppler radar, and inertial measurement unit are merged in the lander's computers to control the operation of the thrusters.[115]

Impact on ExoMars

There is an ESA ministerial meeting in December 2016 which will consider certain issues including 300 million Euros of ExoMars funding and lessons learned from the ExoMars 2016 missions so far.[119] One concern is the Schiapraelli module crash, as this landing system is being produced in near duplication for the ExoMars 2020 mission consisting of the ExoMars rover delivered by the instrumented ExoMars 2020 surface platform.[119] The ExoMars team has been praised for "putting a brave face" on what happened and being positive about the EDM's very credible return on its prime mission: data about entry, descent, and landing, despite the difficulties on final landing.[120] Also, there is the successful insertion of the TGO into Mars orbit with its large science payload.[120] Another positive was the development of the demonstrator module as part of the overall grand plan for ExoMars, which meant that the landing technologies underwent a real-world test before carrying more valuable cargo.[121] Just as the EDM itself was tested on Earth to gain knowledge about how it would perform on Mars, the EDM is also a test for future missions.[122] Study of what happened is critical, as significant breakthroughs in understanding can impact the lessons learned from a mission, which in turn effects public opinion, technology, future mission design, and even the feelings of everyone involved.[123] For example, Beagle 2 Mars lander was suspected to have undergone a high velocity impact with Mars in 2003, but when it was found on Mars intact with its panels partly deployed the EDL design was validatedbut only after more than a decade.[124] The lead developer did suffer heavy criticism and even ridicule for this failure, eventually dying from a brain hemorrhage in 2014, just a year before his spacecraft was found.[125][126] As of November 2016, it will take time for data from the EDM to be studied and for the verdicts of the ESA councils and leadership to be revealed.[119] A preliminary report on the malfunction will be presented at the December 2016 ESA ministerial meeting.[127]

Landing location

Acidalia Planitia Acidalia Planitia Alba Mons Amazonis Planitia Aonia Terra Arabia Terra Arcadia Planitia Arcadia Planitia Argyre Planitia Elysium Mons Elysium Planitia Hellas Planitia Hesperia Planum Isidis Planitia Lucas Planum Lyot Crater Noachis Terra Olympus Mons Promethei Terra Rudaux Crater Solis Planum Tempe Terra Terra Cimmeria Terra Sabaea Terra Sirenum Tharsis Montes Utopia Planitia Valles Marineris Vastitas Borealis Vastitas BorealisMap of Mars
Interactive imagemap of the global topography of Mars, overlain with locations of Mars landers and rovers (Red label = Rover; Blue label = Lander; bold red/blue = currently active). Hover your mouse to see the names of over 25 prominent geographic features, and click to link to them. Coloring of the base map indicates relative elevations, based on data from the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter on NASA's Mars Global Surveyor. Reds and pinks are higher elevation (+3 km to +8 km); yellow is 0 km; greens and blues are lower elevation (down to −8 km). Whites (>+12 km) and browns (>+8 km) are the highest elevations. Axes are latitude and longitude; Poles are not shown.
(also see Memorials & Mars Memorials map) (view • discuss)
Beagle 2 (2003)
Curiosity (2012) →
Deep Space 2 (1999)
Mars 2 (1971)
Mars 3 (1971)
Mars 6 (1973)
Polar Lander (1999)
Opportunity (2004)
Phoenix (2008)
Schiaparelli EDM (2016)
Sojourner (1997)
Spirit (2004)
Viking 1 (1976)
Viking 2 (1976)

Glossary

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Schiaparelli science package and science investigations". European Space Agency. 10 March 2016.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 "ExoMars - Satellite Missions - eoPortal Directory". Directory.eoportal.org. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.20861. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 "Schiaparelli: the ExoMars Entry, Descent and Landing Demonstrator Module". European Space Agency. 2013. Retrieved 1 October 2014.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Patterson, Sean (8 November 2013). "ESA Names ExoMars Lander 'Schiaparelli'". Space Fellowship.
  5. "The European probe to Mars takes off today from Turin Airport". La Stampa. 23 December 2015.
  6. 1 2 3 "Static Electricity, Toxic Dust, and the Red Planet: How NASA is Preparing to Send Humans to Mars | JYI – The Undergraduate Research Journal". Jyi.org. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  7. "The European Space Exploration Programme Aurora / Exploration / Human Spaceflight / Our Activities / ESA". Esa.int. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  8. 1 2 "Mission to Mars via Antarctica / Research / Human Spaceflight / Our Activities / ESA". Esa.int. 2005-12-21. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  9. 1 2 3 "ExoMars TGO reaches Mars orbit while EDM situation under assessment". European Space Agency. 19 October 2016. Retrieved 19 October 2016.
  10. Chang, Kenneth (21 October 2016). "Dark Spot in Mars Photo Is Probably Wreckage of European Spacecraft". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  11. 1 2 3 Amos, Jonathan (25 November 2015). "Europe's ExoMars missions are go - finally". BBC News. Retrieved 23 October 2016.
  12. Marlaire, Ruth (14 May 2007). "A Gloomy Mars Warms Up". NASA. Retrieved 23 October 2016.
  13. 1 2 3 Schmadel, Lutz D. (2007). "(4062) Schiaparelli". Dictionary of Minor Planet Names – (4062) Schiaparelli. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 347. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-29925-7_4041. ISBN 978-3-540-00238-3. Retrieved 4 July 2016.
  14. "MPC/MPO/MPS Archive". Minor Planet Center. Retrieved 4 July 2016.
  15. "Schiaparelli Dorsum". Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature, International Astronomical Union (IAU) Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature (WGPSN).
  16. Amos, Jonathan (2009-07-25). "Science & Environment | Europe's Mars rover slips to 2018". BBC News. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  17. "Micro-Ares, An electric field sensor for ExoMars 2016" (PDF). Meetingorganizer.copernicus.org. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 "Figure 2: ExoMars Rover in stowed configuration - Scientific Figure on ResearchGate". Researchgate.net. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  19. "Figure 2: ExoMars Rover in stowed configuration - Scientific Figure on ResearchGate". Researchgate.net. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Project History – ExoMars". Spaceflight101.com. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  21. "Figure 5: Locomotion Subsystem design of MDA - Scientific Figure on ResearchGate". Researchgate.net. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  22. "The ExoMars Instruments". European Space Agency. 1 February 2008. Archived from the original on 26 October 2012. Retrieved 8 May 2012.
  23. Amos, Jonathan (15 June 2009). "Europe's Mars mission scaled back". BBC News.
  24. "The Future Mars mission". Planets.oma.be. 2015-04-15. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  25. "ExoMars 2016 Schiaparelli Module in Baikonur". ESA. SpaceRef. 6 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  26. Jonathan Amos (14 March 2016). "Mars methane mission lifts off". BBC. Retrieved 14 March 2016.
  27. Elizabeth Gibney (11 March 2016). "Mars launch to test collaboration between Europe and Russia". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19547. Retrieved 14 March 2016.
  28. "ExoMars on its way to solve the Red Planet's mysteries". ESA. 14 March 2016. Retrieved 15 March 2016.
  29. King, Bob (24 March 2016). "ExoMars Mission Narrowly Avoids Exploding Booster". Universe Today. Retrieved 25 March 2016.
  30. 1 2 3 4 5 "Separate paths for ExoMars - The Schiaparelli probe will separate from its parent spacecraft on 16 October 2016". Dlr.de. 2016-10-14. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  31. 1 2 "Live updates: ExoMars arrival and landing / ExoMars / Space Science / Our Activities / ESA". Esa.int. 2016-10-19. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  32. "Exomars : Media Kit : Europe's New Era of Mars Exploration" (PDF). Esamultimedia.esa.int. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  33. 1 2 "Mars launch to test collaboration between Europe and Russia : Nature News & Comment". Nature.com. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19547. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  34. Malik, Tariq (16 October 2016). "European Mars Lander Separates From Mothership, Takes Aim at Red Planet". Space.com. Retrieved 16 October 2016.
  35. "Schiaparelli EDM – ExoMars". Spaceflight101.com. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  36. 1 2 3 Aron, Jacob (7 March 2016). "ExoMars probe set to sniff out signs of life on the Red Planet". New Scientist. Retrieved 7 March 2016.
  37. Allen, Mark; Witasse, Olivier (16 June 2011), "2016 ESA/NASA ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter", MEPAG June 2011, Jet Propulsion Laboratory (PDF)
  38. 1 2 3 "Separate paths for ExoMars - The Schiaparelli probe will separate from its parent spacecraft on 16 October 2016". Research in Germany. Retrieved: 31 October 2016.
  39. "ExoMars is scheduled to land on the red planet on October 19". Business Insider. 2016-10-14. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  40. 1 2 "A stormy arrival for Schiaparelli?". European Space Agency. Retrieved: 31 October 2016.
  41. NASA - Space Shuttle Challenger Crew Memorialized on Mars
  42. 1 2 3 "Entry, Descent and Surface Science for 2016 Mars Mission". Science Daily. 10 June 2010.
  43. 1 2 Guy Webster (2016-10-05). "News | Study Predicts Next Global Dust Storm on Mars". Jpl.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  44. "Planet Gobbling Dust Storms | Science Mission Directorate". Science.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  45. 1 2 "ESA - Robotic Exploration of Mars: The hazards of landing on Mars". Exploration.esa.int. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  46. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "ESA - Robotic Exploration of Mars: Schiaparelli: the ExoMars Entry, Descent and Landing Demonstrator Module". Exploration.esa.int. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  47. "Separate paths for ExoMars - The Schiaparelli probe will separate from its parent spacecraft on 16 October 2016". Dlr.de. 2016-10-14. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  48. 1 2 3 Vago, J.; et al. (August 2013). "ExoMars, ESA's next step in Mars exploration" (PDF). ESA Bulletin (155). pp. 12–23.
  49. Jacqueline Ronson (2016-10-17). "How ESA's Schiaparelli Lander Will Touch Down on Mars". Inverse.com. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  50. Dickinson, David (16 October 2016). "Schiaparelli Lander to Touch Down on Mars". Sky & Telescope.
  51. 1 2 Lakdawalla, Emily (19 October 2016). "Brief update: Opportunity's attempt to image Schiaparelli unsuccessful". The Planetary Society.
  52. "ESA - Robotic Exploration of Mars: ExoMars 2016 Schiaparelli descent sequence". Exploration.esa.int. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  53. 1 2 "Europe's Mars probe destroyed after plunging to surface - SWI". Swissinfo.ch. 2016-10-21. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  54. 1 2 Chan, Sewell (20 October 2016). "No Signal From Mars Lander, but European Officials Declare Mission a Success". The New York Times. Retrieved 20 October 2016.
  55. 1 2 de Selding, Perer B. (20 October 2016). "Europe's ExoMars enters Mars orbit, but lander feared lost". Space News. Paris. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  56. 1 2 "Schiaparelli descent data: decoding underway". ESA. 20 October 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2016.
  57. Amos, Jonathan (21 October 2016). "Schiaparelli Mars probe's parachute 'jettisoned too early'". BBC News. Germany. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  58. Webster, Guy (21 October 2016). "Camera on Mars Orbiter Shows Signs of Latest Mars Lander". NASA. Retrieved 24 October 2016.
  59. "Camera on Mars Orbiter Shows Signs of Latest Mars Lander". NASA. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  60. Likely Schiaparelli crash site imaged by Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Emily Lakdawalla, The Planetary Society. 21 October 2016.
  61. 1 2 3 4 5 "Detailed images of Schiaparelli and its descent hardware on Mars / ExoMars / Space Science / Our Activities / ESA". Esa.int. 2016-10-27. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  62. "Detailed images of Schiaparelli and its descent hardware on Mars". Phys.org. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  63. "Arizona State University: THOR Mission". Thor.asu.edu. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  64. "HiRISE | Icy Craters on Mars (ESP_016954_2245)". Uahirise.org. 2010-04-21. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  65. "ESA - Robotic Exploration of Mars: ExoMars 2016 Schiaparelli descent sequence". Exploration.esa.int. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  66. 1 2 3 "Missing Mars lander Schiaparelli may have ditched parachute too early (From Impartial Reporter)". Impartialreporter.com. 2016-10-20. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  67. 1 2 Wall, Mike (21 October 2016). "ExoMars '96 Percent' Successful Despite Lander Crash: ESA". Space.com. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  68. "HiRISE | ExoMars EDM Landing Site in Meridiani Planum". Hirise.lpl.arizona.edu. 2016-10-19. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  69. 1 2 "Schiaparelli crash site in colour / ExoMars / Space Science / Our Activities / ESA". Esa.int. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  70. 1 2 3 4 "Space Images | Schiaparelli Impact Site on Mars, in Color". Jpl.nasa.gov. 2016-10-19. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  71. "Schiaparelli landing investigation makes progress". 23 November 2016.
  72. 1 2 "ExoMars 2016". National Space Science Data Center. NASA. Retrieved 23 August 2016.
  73. 1 2 F. Esposito, et al., DREAMS for the ExoMars 2016 mission: a suite of sensors for the characterization of Martian environment" (PDF). European Planetary Science Congress 2013, EPSC Abstracts Vol. 8, EPSC2013-815 (2013)
  74. Posted. "ExoMars: Schiaparelli Analysis to Continue | The Planetary Society". Planetary.org. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  75. "ESA - Robotic Exploration of Mars: INRRI integrated on board ExoMars Schiaparelli". Exploration.esa.int. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  76. 1 2 3 Electric Dust Storms on Mars. NASA.
  77. "NASA - The Case Of The Electric Martian Dust Devils". Nasa.gov. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  78. 1 2 "EDM surface payload". European Space Agency (ESA). 19 December 2011.
  79. Detailed images of Schiaparelli and its descent hardware on Mars. ESA, 27 October 2016.
  80. "Schiaparelli Instrument Overview – ExoMars". Spaceflight101.com. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  81. Ferri, F.; Forget, F.; Lewis, S.R.; Karatekin, O. (16–22 June 2012), "ExoMars Atmospheric Mars Entry and Landing Investigations and Analysis (AMELIA)" (PDF), ExoMars Entry, Descent and Landing Science (PDF), Toulouse, France, archived from the original (PDF) on 23 October 2013
  82. 1 2 3 "What to expect from Schiaparelli's camera". European Space Agency. Retrieved: 22 October 2016.
  83. 1 2 "ESA - Robotic Exploration of Mars: DECA – the descent camera on Schiaparelli". Exploration.esa.int. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  84. "ExoMars: Schiaparelli Analysis to Continue | The Planetary Society". Planetary.org. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  85. "Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter views Schiaparelli landing site". European Space Agency. 21 October 2016.
  86. Clark, Stephen (31 October 2016). "Mars orbiter locates Schiaparelli lander's crash site". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 2016-11-02.
  87. mars.nasa.gov. "Quick Facts". Mars.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  88. 1 2 3 4 "Schiaparelli to make Europe's second Mars landing attempt". Russianspaceweb.com. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  89. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Ormston, Thomas (18 October 2016). "Listening to an Alien Landing". European Space agency.
  90. Amos, Jonathan (15 March 2012). "Europe still keen on Mars missions". BBC News.
  91. Morring, Jr., Frank (14 February 2012). "NASA Units Hope For Robotic Mars Mission In 2018". Aviation Week.
  92. de Selding, Peter B. (5 October 2012). "Russian Export Rules Force ExoMars Mission Changes". Space News.
  93. Kane, Van (14 June 2011). "Goals of ESA's Mars Demonstration Lander". Future Planetary Exploration.
  94. Goals of ESA's Mars Demonstration Lander. Future Planetary Exploration, 14 June 2011.
  95. Webster, Guy (17 November 2006). "NASA's Newest Mars Orbiter Passes Communications Relay Test". NASA. Retrieved 23 October 2016.
  96. We're listening: Earth tracking the Schiaparelli lander 19 October - ESA BLOG
  97. We're listening: Earth tracking the Schiaparelli lander 19 October - ESA BLOG
  98. Toothman, Jessika. "How Do Humans age in space?". HowStuffWorks. Retrieved 2012-04-24.
  99. Lu, Ed. "Expedition 7 Relativity". Ed's Musing from Space. NASA. Retrieved 2012-04-24.
  100. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Schiaparelli Mars Lander (EDM)". Spaceflight101.com. Retrieved: 27 October 2016.
  101. "ESA - Robotic Exploration of Mars: EDM parachute system tests". Exploration.esa.int. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
  102. 1 2 3 4 5 6
  103. 1 2 3
  104. 1 2 .
  105. Amos, Jonathan (7 November 2016). "Key meeting to weigh Mars crash report". BBC News. Retrieved 2016-11-07.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Schiaparelli EDM lander.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/1/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.