Tibble v. Edison International

Tibble v. Edison International

Argued February 24, 2015
Decided May 18, 2015
Full case name Glenn Tibble, et al, Petitioners v. Edison International, et al.
Docket nos. 13–550
Citations

575 U.S. ___ (more)

Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Breyer, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Employee Retirement Income Security Act

Tibble v. Edison International, 575 U.S. ___ (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "because a fiduciary normally has a continuing duty to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, a plaintiff may allege that a fiduciary breached a duty of prudence by failing to properly monitor investments and remove imprudent ones. Such a claim is timely as long it is filed within six years of the alleged breach of continuing duty."[1]

Opinion of the Court

Associate Justice Stephen Breyer authored the unanimous opinion of the Court.[2]

References

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/6/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.