Air Caledonie International v Commonwealth

Air Caledonie International v Commonwealth
Court High Court of Australia
Full case name Air Caledonie International v The Commonwealth
Decided 24 November 1988
Citation(s) (1988) 165 CLR 462
Case history
Prior action(s) none
Subsequent action(s) none
Case opinions
(7:0) The Migration Amendment Act 1987 was invalid (per Mason CJ, Wilson, Brennan, Deane, Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron JJ)
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Mason CJ, Wilson, Brennan, Deane, Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron JJ

Air Caledonie International v Commonwealth (1988) 165 CLR 462[1] is a High Court of Australia case that provides guidance as to the constitutional definition of a tax.

Facts

The Commonwealth passed an amendment modifying the Migration Act 1958. The amendment imposed a fee on all persons entering Australia for immigration clearance. The implementation of such a scheme meant that airline operators would have to make payments to the Commonwealth government.

Decision

The High Court unanimously held that the fee for migration clearance was a tax. If section 55 of the Australian Constitution (which requires that legislation imposing tax deals only with imposing tax) is read literally, the effect of this decision would have invalidated the rest of the Migration Act. The Court was thus careful to invalidate only the Amending Act. The migration clearance fee was a tax because it has all the positive attributes of a tax. It was:

The court also provided some guidance as to the characteristics of a tax:

The court also made a distinction between citizens and non-citizens. An Australian citizen cannot be stopped from entering Australia, so although they paid the clearance fee, no service was being rendered to them. Hence the fee paid could not have been a fee for a service.

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/4/2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.