Symbiodinium

Symbiodinium
Scientific classification
Domain: Eukaryota
(unranked): SAR
(unranked): Alveolata
Phylum: Dinoflagellata
Class: Dinophyceae
Order: Suessiales
Family: Symbiodiniaceae
Genus: Symbiodinium
Freudenthal, 1962 [1]
Species
See text

The genus Symbiodinium encompasses the largest and most prevalent group of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates known. These unicellular algal protists commonly reside in the endoderm of tropical cnidarians such as corals, sea anemones, and jellyfish, where the products of their photosynthetic processing are exchanged in the host for inorganic molecules. They are also harbored by various species of sponge, flatworms, mollusks such as the giant clams, foraminifera (soritids), and some ciliates. Generally, these dinoflagellates enter the host cell through phagocytosis, persist as intracellular symbionts, reproduce, and disperse to the environment. The exception is in most mollusks, where Symbiodinium are intercellular (between the cells). Cnidarians that are associated with Symbiodinium occur mostly in warm oligotrophic (nutrient-poor), marine environments where they are often the dominant constituents of benthic communities. These dinoflagellates are therefore among the most abundant eukaryotic microbes found in coral reef ecosystems.

Symbiodinium are colloquially called "zooxanthellae" (or "zoox"), and animals symbiotic with algae in this genus are said to be "zooxanthellate". The term was loosely used to refer to any golden-brown endosymbionts, including diatoms and other dinoflagellates. Continued use of the term in the scientific literature is discouraged because of the confusion caused by overly generalizing taxonomically diverse symbiotic relationships.[2]

Light and confocal images of Symbiodinium cells in hospite (living in a host cell) within scyphistomae of the jellyfish Cassiopea xamachana. This animal requires infection by these algae to complete its life cycle. The chloroplast imaged in 3-D is highly reticulated and distributed around the cell’s periphery

Intracellular symbionts

Symbiodinium reach high cell densities through prolific mitotic division in the endodermal tissues of many shallow tropical and sub-tropical cnidarians. This is a SEM of a freeze-fractured internal mesentery from a reef coral polyp (Porites porites) that shows the distribution and density of symbiont cells.

Symbiodinium are known primarily for their role as mutualistic endosymbionts. In hosts, they usually occur in high densities, ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions per square centimeter.[3] The successful culturing of swimming gymnodinioid cells from coral led to the discovery that "zooxanthellae" were actually dinoflagellates.[4][5] Each Symbiodinium cell is coccoid in hospite (living in a host cell) and surrounded by a membrane that originates from the host cell plasmalemma during phagocytosis (Figures 2B and 3). This membrane probably undergoes some modification to its protein content, which functions to limit or prevent phago-lysosome fusion.[6][7][8] The vacuole structure containing the symbiont is therefore termed the symbiosome. A single symbiont cell occupies each symbiosome. It is unclear how this membrane expands to accommodate a dividing symbiont cell. Under normal conditions, symbiont and host cells exchange organic and inorganic molecules that enable the growth and proliferation of both partners.

Natural services and economic value

Symbiodinium is one of the most studied symbionts. Their mutualistic relationships with reef-building corals form the basis of a highly diverse and productive ecosystem. Coral reefs have economic benefits – valued at hundreds of billions of dollars each year – in the form of ornamental, subsistence and commercial fisheries, tourism and recreation, coastal protection from storms, a source of bioactive compounds for pharmaceutical development, and more.[9]

Coral bleaching

Further information: Effects of global warming

The study of Symbiodinium biology is driven largely by a desire to understand global coral reef decline. A chief mechanism for widespread reef degradation has been stress-induced coral bleaching caused by unusually high seawater temperature. Bleaching is the disassociation of the coral and the symbiont and/or loss of chlorophyll within the alga, resulting in a precipitous loss in the animal’s brown pigmentation. Many Symbiodinium-cnidarian associations are affected by sustained elevation of sea surface temperatures,[10] but may also result from exposure to high irradiance levels (including UVR),[11][12] extreme low temperatures,[13] low salinity[14] and other factors.[15] The bleached state is associated with decreased host calcification,[16] increased disease susceptibility[17] and, if prolonged, partial or total mortality.[18] The magnitude of mortality from a single bleaching event can be global in scale as it was in 2015. These episodes are predicted to become more common and severe as temperatures worldwide continue to rise.[19] The physiology of a resident Symbiodinium species often regulates the bleaching susceptibility of a coral.[20][21] Therefore, a significant amount of research has focused on characterizing the physiological basis of thermal tolerance[22][23][24][25] and in identifying the ecology and distribution of thermally tolerant symbiont species.[26][27][28]

Symbiodinium trenchi is a stress-tolerant species and is able to form mutualistic relationships with many species of coral. It is present in small numbers in coral globally and is common in the Andaman Sea, where the water is about 4 °C (7 °F) warmer than in other parts of the Indian Ocean.[29] In the Caribbean Sea in late 2005, water temperature was elevated for several months and it was found that S. trenchi, a symbiont not normally abundant, took up residence in many corals in which it had not previously been observed. Those corals did not bleach. Two years later, it had largely been replaced as a symbiont by the species normally found in the Caribbean.[27]

S. thermophilum was recently found to make up the bulk of the algal population inside the corals of the Persian Gulf. It is also present in the Gulf of Oman and the Red Sea, at a much lower concentration. Coral that hosted this species was able to tolerate the 35 °C (95 °F) waters of the Persian Gulf, much hotter than the 31 °C (88 °F) of coral reefs globally.[30]

Molecular systematics

The advent of DNA sequence comparison initiated a rebirth in the ordering and naming of all organisms. The application of this methodology helped overturn the long held belief that Symbiodinium comprised a single species, a process which began in earnest with the morphological, physiological, and biochemical comparisons of cultured isolates. Currently, genetic markers are exclusively used to describe ecological patterns and deduce evolutionary relationships among morphologically cryptic members of this group. Foremost in the molecular systematics of Symbiodinium is to resolve ecologically relevant units of diversity (i.e. species).

Phylogenetic disparity among "clades"

Genetic disparity between clades in the genus Symbiodinium compared to other dinoflagellates. Analysis of conserved mitochondrial sequences (CO1) and rDNA (SSU) suggest that a taxonomic revision of this group is required.

The earliest ribosomal gene sequence data indicated that Symbiodinium had lineages whose genetic divergence was similar to that seen in other dinoflagellates from different genera, families, and even orders.[31] This large phylogenetic disparity among clades A, B, C, etc. was confirmed by analyses of the sequences of the mitochondrial gene coding for cytochrome c oxidase subunit I among Dinophyceae.[32] Most of these clade groupings comprise numerous reproductively isolated, genetically distinct lineages (see ‘Species diversity’), exhibiting different ecological and biogeographic distributions (see ‘Geographic distributions and patterns of ‘diversity’). Given the over-simplified perceptions created by using only clade-level taxonomic designations for grouping Symbiodinium, future taxonomic revision of this genus is required. Many of these clades will probably be reclassified into distinct genera.

Species diversity

The investigation of Symbiodinium diversity, ecology, and evolution is enhanced by analysis of ribosomal and single copy nuclear, plastid, and mitochondrial DNA. The use of multiple markers, along with a hierarchical phylogenetic classification provides the genetic resolution necessary for investigating species diversity, biogeography, dispersal, natural selection, and adaptive radiations.

The recognition of species diversity in this genus remained problematic for many decades due the challenges of identifying morphological and biochemical traits useful for diagnosing species.[33] Presently, phylogenetic, ecological, and population genetic data can be more rapidly acquired to resolve Symbiodinium into separate entities that are consistent with Biological, Evolutionary, and Ecological Species Concepts.[34][35] Most genetics-based measures of diversity have been estimated from the analysis of one genetic marker (e.g. LSU, ITS2, or cp23S), yet in recent studies these and other markers were analyzed in combination. The high concordance found among nuclear, mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA argues that a hierarchical phylogenetic scheme, combined with ecological and population genetic data, can unambiguously recognize and assign nomenclature to reproductively isolated lineages, i.e. species.

The analysis of additional phylogenetic markers show that some Symbiodinium that were initially identified by slight differences in ITS sequences may comprise members of the same species[35] whereas, in other cases, two or more genetically divergent lineages can possess the same ancestral ITS sequence.[36][37] When analyzed in the context of the major species concepts,[38] the majority of ITS2 sequence data provide a reasonable proxy for species diversity.[34][35][39] Currently, ITS2 types number in the hundreds, but most communities of symbiotic cnidaria around the world still require comprehensive sampling. Furthermore, there appears to be a large number of unique species found in association with equally diverse species assemblages of soritid foraminifera,[40] as well as many other Symbiodinium that are exclusively free-living and found in varied, often benthic, habitats.[41] Given the potential species diversity of these ecologically cryptic Symbiodinium, the total species number may never be accurately assessed.

Clone diversity and population genetics

Through the use of microsatellite markers, multilocus genotypes identifying a single clonal line of Symbiodinium can be resolved from samples of host tissue. It appears that most individual colonies harbor a single multilocus genotype (i.e. clone).[42][43] Extensive sampling within colonies confirms that many colonies harbor a homogeneous (clonal) Symbiodinium population. Additional genotypes do occur in some colonies, yet rarely more than two or three are found. When present in the same colony, multiple clones often exhibit narrow zones of overlap.[43] Colonies adjacent to each other on a reef may harbor identical clones, but across the host population the clone diversity of a particular Symbiodinium species is potentially large and comprises recombinant genotypes that are the product of sexual recombination. A clone tends to remain dominant in a colony over many months and years, but may be occasionally displaced or replaced. The few studies examining clone dispersal find that most genotypes have limited geographic distributions, but that dispersal and gene flow is likely influenced by host life history and mode of symbiont acquisition (e.g. horizontal vs. vertical).

Species diversity, ecology, and biogeography

Geographic distributions and patterns of diversity

Global distribution and preliminary diversity estimate of common Symbiodinium species associated with cnidarians (rare “species” excluded). Internal transcribed spacer region 2 (ITS2) data (sensu LaJeunesse 2002) are used here as a proxy for species diversity.

Symbiodinium are perhaps the best group for studying micro-eukaryote physiology and ecology for several reasons. Firstly, available phylogenetic and population genetic markers allow for detailed examination of their genetic diversity over broad spatial and temporal scales. Also, large quantities of Symbiodinium cells are readily obtained through the collection of hosts that harbor them. Lastly, their association with animals provides an additional axis by which to compare and contrast ecological distributions.

The earliest genetic methods for assessing Symbiodinium diversity relied on low-resolution molecular markers that separated the genus into a few evolutionarily divergent lineages, referred to as "clades". Previous characterizations of geographic distribution and dominance have focused on the clade-level of genetic resolution, but more detailed assessments of diversity at the species level are needed. While members of a given clade may be ubiquitous, the species diversity within each clade is potentially large, with each species often having different ecological and geographic distributions related to their dispersal ability, host biogeography, and external environmental conditions. A small number of species occur in temperate environments where few symbiotic animals occur. As a result, these high latitude associations tend to be highly species specific.

Species diversity assigned to different ecological guilds

The large diversity of Symbiodinium revealed by genetic analyses is distributed non-randomly and appears to comprise several guilds with distinct ecological habits. Of the many Symbiodinium characterized genetically, most are host-specific, mutualistic, and dominate their host.[44] Others may represent compatible symbionts that remain as low-abundance background populations because of competitive inferiority under the prevailing external environmental conditions (e.g. high light vs. low light).[45] Some may also comprise opportunistic species that may proliferate during periods of physiological stress and displace the normal resident symbiont and remain abundant in the host’s tissues for months to years before being replaced by the original symbiont.[27][46][47] There are also those that rapidly infect and establish populations in host juveniles until being replaced by symbionts that normally associate with host adult colonies.[48] Finally, there appears to be another group of Symbiodinium that are incapable of establishing endosymbiosis yet exist in environments around the animal or associate closely with other substrates (i.e. macro-algal surfaces, sediment surface)[41][49] Symbiodinium from functional groups 2, 3, and 4 are known to exist because they culture easily, however species with these life histories are difficult to study because of their low abundance in the environment.

Figure 12. The distributions of Symbiodinium species comprising different ecological guilds in a coral reef ecosystem. A. Host cnidarians can expel millions of symbiont cells (viable and necrotic) per day into the surrounding environment (a). In turn these animals pass large volumes of water through their gastrovascular system for respiration and waste removal, a process that introduces numerous small particles including food and various other Symbiodinium spp. (indicated by differences in cell color) (b). B. The ecological niche, from the viewpoint of functional groups, differs among species of Symbiodinium. Several ecological guilds exist, including abundant host-specific and host-generalist species (1), low background and potentially opportunistic species (2), and non-symbiotic species closely associated with the coral’s biome (3) and/or occupying unrelated habitats (4)

Free-living and "non-symbiotic" populations

There are few examples of documented populations of free-living Symbiodinium.[41] Given that most host larvae must initially acquire their symbionts from the environment, viable Symbiodinium cells occur outside the host. The motile phase is probably important in the external environment and facilitates the rapid infection of host larvae. The use of aposymbiotic host polyps deployed as "capture vessels" and the application of molecular techniques has allowed for the detection of environmental sources of Symbiodinium.[47][50] With these methods employed, investigators may resolve the distribution of different species on various benthic surfaces[49] and cell densities suspended in the water column.[51] The genetic identities of cells cultured from the environment are often dissimilar to those found in hosts. These likely do not form endosymbioses and are entirely free-living; they are different from "dispersing" symbiotic species.[44] Learning more about the "private lives" of these environmental populations and their ecological function will further our knowledge about the diversity, dispersal success, and evolution among members within this large genus.

Culturing

Certain Symbiodinium strains and/or species are more easily cultured and can persist in artificial or supplemented seawater media (e.g. ASP–8A, F/2) for decades. The comparison of cultured isolates under identical conditions show clear differences in morphology, size, biochemistry, gene expression, swimming behavior, growth rates, etc.[52][53][54] This pioneering comparative approach initiated a slow paradigm shift in recognizing that this genus comprised more than a single species.

It should be noted that culturing is a selective process, and many Symbiodinium isolates growing on artificial media are not typical of the species normally associated with a particular host. Indeed, most host–specific species have yet to be cultured. Samples for genetic analysis should be acquired from the source colony in order to match the resulting culture with the identity of the dominant and ecologically relevant symbiont originally harbored by the animal.[44][55][56]

Life cycle

Symbiodinium Life Cycle

The life cycle of Symbiodinium was first described from cells growing in culture media. For isolates that are in log phase growth, division rates occur every 1–3 days, with Symbiodinium cells alternating between a spherical, or coccoid, morphology and a smaller flagellated motile mastigote stage (see ‘Morphological Characteristics’). While several similar schemes are published that describe how each morphological state transitions to other, the most compelling life history reconstruction was deduced from light and electron microscopy and nuclear staining evidence.[57] During asexual propagation (sometimes referred to as mitotic or vegetative growth), cells undergo a diel cycle of karyokinesis (chromosome/nuclear division) in darkness. The mother cell then divides (cytokinesis) soon after exposure to light and releases two motile cells. The initiation and duration of motility varies among species.[57] Approaching or at the end of the photoperiod the mastigotes cease swimming, release their flagella, and undergo a rapid metamorphosis into the coccoid form. As cultures reach stationary growth phase, fewer and fewer motile cells are observed, indicating slower division rates.

Large tetrads are occasionally observed, particularly when cells in stationary growth phase are transferred to fresh media. However, it is unknown whether this stage is the product two consecutive mitotic divisions, or perhaps a process that generates sexually competent motile cells (i.e. gametes), or is the end result of meiosis following gamete fusion. There is no cytological evidence for sexual recombination, and meiosis has never been observed, but population genetic evidence supports the view that Symbiodinium periodically undergo events of sexual recombination.[36][58][59] How, when, and where the sexual phase in their life history occurs remains unknown.

Morphology

The morphological description of the genus Symbiodinium is originally based on the type species (holotype) Symbiodinium microadriaticum[33][60] Because these dinoflagellates possess two major stages in their life history (see above), namely the mastigote (motile) and coccoid (non-motile) stages, the morphology of both are described in order to provide a complete diagnosis of the organism.

The life stages of dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium. (A) Electron micrographs of a Symbiodinium mastigote (motile cell) with characteristic gymnodinioid morphology (S. natans; Hansen & Daugbjerg 2009) and (B) the coccoid cell in hospite. As free-living cells the mastigote allows for short-range dispersal and can exhibit chemo-taxis toward sources of nitrogen. Once within the host, these symbionts rapidly proliferate in and in many cases dominate the cytoplasm of the host cell.

The flagellated (mastigote) cell

The motile flagellated form is gymnodinioid and athecate[61] The relative dimensions of the epicone and hypocone differ among species.[33] The alveoli are most visible in the motile phase but lack fibrous cellulosic structures found in thecate ("armored") dinoflagellates. Between the points of origin of the two flagella is an extendable structure of unknown function called the peduncle. In other dinoflagellates, an analogous structure has been implicated in heterotrophic feeding and sexual recombination. In Symbiodinium, it has been suggested that the peduncle may be involved in substrate attachment, explaining why certain cells seem to spin in place.[60] Compared to other gymnodinioid genera, there is little or no displacement at the sulcus where the ends of the cigulum groove converge.

The internal organelles of the mastigote are essentially the same as described in the coccoid cell (see below). The transition from mastigote to coccoid stage in Symbiodinium occurs rapidly, but details about cellular changes are unknown. Mucocysts (an ejectile organelle[62]) located beneath the plasmalemma are found in S. pilosum and their function is unknown, but may be involved in heterotrophic feeding.

Fine scale features and organelles found among Symbiodinium. (A) Close-up of divided cells of a tetrad from a culture of “S. corculorum” that is genetically similar to S. pilosum (both are type A2). This particular lineage is unusual among described Symbiodinium by possessing mucocysts, and chloroplasts with parallel and peripheral thylakoid arrangements. Flagella are seen in cross section in the space between daughter cells. (B) A thick cellulosic cell wall is observed for many cultured isolates. (C) TEM of a cross-section through a chloroplast lobe at the periphery of the cell with parallel and peripheral thylakoids grouped in sets of three.

The coccoid cell

Transmission electron micrograph of cross-section through a dividing cell (the doublet). The light micrograph inset depicts a doublet in culture. Flagella are present from the daughter mastigote cells (white arrowheads) prior to emerging from the mother cell wall. n = nucleus; acc = accumulation body; pyr = pyrenoid. (TEM from Trench et al. 1981)

The coccoid cell of Symbiodinium is spherical and ranges in average diameter from 6 to 13 µm, depending on the species (Blank et al. 1989). This stage is often wrongly interpreted as a dinocyst; hence, in published literature, the alga in hospite is often referred to as a vegetative cyst.[60] The term cyst usually refers to a dormant, metabolically quiescent stage in the life history of other dinoflagellates, initiated by several factors, including nutrient availability, temperature, and day length.[63] Such cysts permit extended resistance to unfavourable environmental conditions. Coccoid Symbiodinium cells are metabolically active, as they photosynthesize, undergo mitosis, and actively synthesize proteins and nucleic acids. While most dinoflagellates undergo mitosis as a mastigote, in Symbiodinium, mitosis occurs exclusively in the coccoid cell.[57]

The cell wall

The coccoid cell is surrounded by a cellulosic, usually smooth cell wall that contains large molecular weight proteins and glycoproteins.[33][64] Cell walls grow thicker in culture than in hospite (Fig 11B).[6] The cell membrane (plasmalemma) is located beneath the cell wall yet little is known about its composition and function in terms of the regulation of trans-membrane transport of metabolites. During karyokinesis and cytokinesis, the cell wall remains intact until the mastigotes escape the mother cell. In culture, the discarded walls accumulate at the bottom of the culture vessel. It is not known what becomes of the walls from divided cells in hospite.[65] One species, S. pilosum, possesses tufts of hair-like projections from the cell wall; this is the only known surface characteristic used to diagnose a species in the genus.

The chloroplast

Most described species possess a single, peripheral, reticulated chloroplast bounded by three membranes. The volume of the cell occupied by the chloroplast varies among species.[33] The lamellae comprise three closely appressed (stacked) thylakoids, and are attached by two stalks to the pyrenoid[33] surrounded by a starch sheath. In three of the described species, the thylakoids are in parallel arrays, but in S. pilosum, there are also peripheral lamellae. There are no thylakoid membranes invading the pyrenoid, which is unlike other symbiotic dinoflagellates.[66][67] The lipid components of thylakoids include the galactolipids (monogalactosyl-diglycerides, digalactosyl-diglycerides), the sulpholipid, (sulphoquinovosyl-diglyceride), phosphatidyl glycerol, and phosphatidyl choline. Associated with these are various fatty acids.[68] The light-harvesting and reaction centre components in the thylakoid membrane include a water-soluble peridinin-chlorophyll (chl.) a-protein complex (PCP), and a membrane-bound chl. a-chl. c2–peridinin- protein complex (acpPC), along with typical photosynthetic electron transport systems such as the photosystem II reaction centre and the chl. aP700 reaction centre complex of photosystem I.[69][70] Also associated with the thylakoids are the xanthophylls dinoxanthin, diadinoxanthin, diatoxanthin and the carotene, B-carotene. The pyrenoid contains the nuclear-encoded enzyme type II Ribulose-bis-phosphate- carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco),[71] which is responsible for the catalysis of inorganic carbon dioxide into organic compounds.

All cultured isolates (i.e. strains) are capable of phenotypic adjustment in their capacity for light harvesting (i.e. photoacclimation), such as by altering the cellular Chl a and peridinin quota, as well as the size and number of photosynthetic units.[72] However, the ability to acclimate is a reflection of genetic differences among species that are differently adapted (evolved) to a particular photic environment.[73][74] For example, S. pilosum is characterized as a high light adapted species, while others are low light adapted (S. kawagutii) or adapted to a larger range in varying light fields (S. microadriaticum).

The reticulated chloroplast structures of (A) Symbiodinium goreaui (type C1), (B) “S. fitti” (type A3), and (C) “S. californium” (type E1) imaged in 3-D using confocal microscopy of chlorophyll autofluorescence

The nucleus

In general, the nucleus is centrally located and the nucleolus is often associated with the inner nuclear membrane. The chromosomes, as in other dinoflagellates, are seen as ‘permanently super-coiled’ DNA in transmission electron micrographs (TEM).[75] The described species of Symbiodinium possess distinct chromosome numbers (ranging from 26-97[33]), which remain constant throughout all phases of the nuclear cycle. However, during M-phase, the volume of each chromosome is halved, as is the volume of each of the two resulting nuclei. Thus, the ratio of chromosome volume to nuclear volume remains constant. These observations are consistent with the interpretation that the algae are haploid, a conclusion supported by molecular genetic data.[76] During S-phase of the nuclear cycle the chromosomes do uncoil to facilitate DNA synthesis, and the volumes of both the chromosomes and the nucleus return to that seen in the G2 stage.[75]

Other cytoplasmic organelles

There are several additional organelles found in the cytoplasm of Symbiodinium. The most obvious of these is the structure referred to as the "accumulation body". This is a membrane-bound vesicle (vacuole) with contents that are unrecognizable, but appear red or yellow under the light microscope. It may serve to accumulate cellular debris or act as an autophagic vacuole in which non-functional organelles are digested and their components recycled. During mitosis, only one daughter cell appears to acquire this structure. There are other vacuoles that may contain membranous inclusions,[77] while still others contain crystalline material variously interpreted as oxalate crystals or crystalline uric acid.

Species

The following species are recognised by the World Register of Marine Species:[1]

References

  1. 1 2 Guiry, Michael D. (2014). "Symbiodinium Freudenthal, 1962". World Register of Marine Species. Retrieved 2015-01-29.
  2. ↑ Blank, Rudolf J.; Trench, Robert K. (May 1986). "Nomenclature of Endosymbiotic Dinoflagellates". Taxon. 35 (2): 286–94. JSTOR 1221270.
  3. ↑ Stimson, J.; Sakai, K.; Sembali, H. (December 2002). "Interspecific comparison of the symbiotic relationship in corals with high and low rates of bleaching-induced mortality". Coral Reefs. 21 (4): 409–21. Retrieved 8 August 2016.
  4. ↑ Kawaguti, Siro (1944). "On the physiology of reef corals VI. Study on the pigments". Palau Tropical Biological Station Studies. 2: 617–74.
  5. ↑ McLaughlin, John J. A.; Zahl, Paul A. (1959). "Axenic Zooxanthellae from Various Invertebrate Hosts". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 77 (2): 55–72. Bibcode:1959NYASA..77...55M. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1959.tb36892.x.
  6. 1 2 Colley, Nansi J.; Trench, R. K. (1983). "Selectivity in Phagocytosis and Persistence of Symbiotic Algae by the Scyphistoma Stage of the Jellyfish Cassiopeia xamachana". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 219 (1214): 61–82. Bibcode:1983RSPSB.219...61C. doi:10.1098/rspb.1983.0059. JSTOR 35678. PMID 22470960.
  7. ↑ Wakefield, Timothy S.; Kempf, Stephen C. (2001). "Development of host- and symbiont-specific monoclonal antibodies and confirmation of the origin of the symbiosome membrane in a cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis". The Biological bulletin. 200 (2): 127–43. JSTOR 1543306. PMID 11341574.
  8. ↑ Peng, Shao-En; Wang, Yu-Bao; Wang, Li-Hsueh; Chen, Wan-Nan Uang; Lu, Chi-Yu; Fang, Lee-Shing; Chen, Chii-Shiarng (2010). "Proteomic analysis of symbiosome membranes in Cnidaria-dinoflagellate endosymbiosis". Proteomics. 10 (5): 1002–16. doi:10.1002/pmic.200900595. PMID 20049864.
  9. ↑ Moberg, Fredrik; Folke, Carl (1999). "Ecological goods and services of coral reef ecosystems". Ecological Economics. 29 (2): 215–33. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00009-9.
  10. ↑ Jokiel, P. L.; Coles, S. L. (1990). "Response of Hawaiian and other Indo-Pacific reef corals to elevated temperature". Coral Reefs. 8 (4): 155–62. Bibcode:1990CorRe...8..155J. doi:10.1007/BF00265006.
  11. ↑ Lesser, Michael P (1996). "Elevated temperatures and ultraviolet radiation cause oxidative stress and inhibit photosynthesis in symbiotic dinoflagellates". Limnology and Oceanography. 41 (2): 271–83. doi:10.4319/lo.1996.41.2.0271.
  12. ↑ Fitt, William; Brown, Barbara; Warner, Mark; Dunne, Richard (2001). "Coral bleaching: Interpretation of thermal tolerance limits and thermal thresholds in tropical corals". Coral Reefs. 20 (1): 51–65. doi:10.1007/s003380100146.
  13. ↑ Lajeunesse, Todd C.; Smith, Robin; Walther, Mariana; Pinzon, Jorge; Pettay, Daniel T.; McGinley, Michael; Aschaffenburg, Matthew; Medina-Rosas, Pedro; Cupul-Magana, Amilcar L.; Pérez, Andrés López; Reyes-Bonilla, Hector; Warner, Mark E. (2010). "Host-symbiont recombination versus natural selection in the response of coral-dinoflagellate symbioses to environmental disturbance". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 277 (1696): 2925–34. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0385. JSTOR 27862400. PMC 2982020Freely accessible. PMID 20444713.
  14. ↑ Goreau, Thomas F (1964). "Mass Expulsion of Zooxanthellae from Jamaican Reef Communities after Hurricane Flora". Science. 145 (3630): 383–6. Bibcode:1964Sci...145..383G. doi:10.1126/science.145.3630.383. PMID 17816975.
  15. ↑ Brown, Barbara E. (2000). "The significance of pollution in eliciting the 'bleaching' response in symbiotic cnidarians". International Journal of Environment and Pollution. 13 (1–6): 392–415.
  16. ↑ Colombo-Pallotta et al. 2010
  17. ↑ Brandt, Marilyn E.; McManus, John W. (2009). "Disease incidence is related to bleaching extent in reef-building corals". Ecology. 90 (10): 2859–67. doi:10.1890/08-0445.1. JSTOR 25592820. PMID 19886494.
  18. ↑ Baker, Andrew C.; Glynn, Peter W.; Riegl, Bernhard (2008). "Climate change and coral reef bleaching: An ecological assessment of long-term impacts, recovery trends and future outlook". Estuarine. 80 (4): 435–71. Bibcode:2008ECSS...80..435B. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2008.09.003.
  19. ↑ Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Mumby, P. J.; Hooten, A. J.; Steneck, R. S.; Greenfield, P.; Gomez, E.; Harvell, C. D.; Sale, P. F.; Edwards, A. J.; Caldeira, K.; Knowlton, N.; Eakin, C. M.; Iglesias-Prieto, R.; Muthiga, N.; Bradbury, R. H.; Dubi, A.; Hatziolos, M. E. (2007). "Coral Reefs Under Rapid Climate Change and Ocean Acidification". Science. 318 (5857): 1737–42. Bibcode:2007Sci...318.1737H. doi:10.1126/science.1152509. PMID 18079392.
  20. ↑ Berkelmans, R.; Van Oppen, M. J.H (2006). "The role of zooxanthellae in the thermal tolerance of corals: A 'nugget of hope' for coral reefs in an era of climate change". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 273 (1599): 2305–12. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3567. PMC 1636081Freely accessible. PMID 16928632.
  21. ↑ Sampayo, E. M.; Ridgway, T.; Bongaerts, P.; Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (2008). "Bleaching susceptibility and mortality of corals are determined by fine-scale differences in symbiont type". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (30): 10444–9. Bibcode:2008PNAS..10510444S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708049105. JSTOR 25463173. PMC 2492480Freely accessible. PMID 18645181.
  22. ↑ Robison, Jennifer D.; Warner, Mark E. (2006). "Differential Impacts of Photoacclimation and Thermal Stress on the Photobiology of Four Different Phylotypes of Symbiodinium (Pyrrhophyta)". Journal of Phycology. 42 (3): 568–79. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00232.x.
  23. ↑ Warner, Mark E.; Lajeunesse, Todd C.; Robison, Jennifer D.; Thur, Rebecca M. (2006). "The ecological distribution and comparative photobiology of symbiotic dinoflagellates from reef corals in Belize: Potential implications for coral bleaching". Limnology and Oceanography. 51 (4): 1887–97. doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.4.1887.
  24. ↑ Ragni, Maria; Airs, Ruth L.; Hennige, Sebastian J.; Suggett, David J.; Warner, Mark E.; Geider, Richard J. (2010). "PSII photoinhibition and photorepair in Symbiodinium (Pyrrhophyta) differs between thermally tolerant and sensitive phylotypes". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 406: 57–70. doi:10.3354/meps08571.
  25. ↑ Takahashi, Shunichi; Whitney, Spencer; Itoh, Shigeru; Maruyama, Tadashi; Badger, Murray (2008). "Heat stress causes inhibition of the de novo synthesis of antenna proteins and photobleaching in cultured Symbiodinium". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (11): 4203–8. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105.4203T. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708554105. JSTOR 25461395. PMC 2393757Freely accessible. PMID 18322010.
  26. ↑ Lien, Yi-T.; Nakano, Y.; Plathong, S.; Fukami, H.; Wang, Jih-T.; Chen, C. A. (2007). "Occurrence of the putatively heat-tolerant Symbiodinium phylotype D in high-latitudinal outlying coral communities". Coral Reefs. 26 (1): 35–44. Bibcode:2007CorRe..26...35L. doi:10.1007/s00338-006-0185-7.
  27. 1 2 3 Lajeunesse, Todd C.; Smith, Robin T.; Finney, Jennifer; Oxenford, Hazel (2009). "Outbreak and persistence of opportunistic symbiotic dinoflagellates during the 2005 Caribbean mass coral 'bleaching' event". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 276 (1676): 4139–48. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1405. JSTOR 40506039. PMC 2821356Freely accessible. PMID 19740874.
  28. ↑ Lajeunesse, Todd C.; Pettay, Daniel T.; Sampayo, Eugenia M.; Phongsuwan, Niphon; Brown, Barbara; Obura, David O.; Hoegh-Guldberg, Ove; Fitt, William K. (2010). "Long-standing environmental conditions, geographic isolation and host-symbiont specificity influence the relative ecological dominance and genetic diversification of coral endosymbionts in the genus Symbiodinium". Journal of Biogeography. 37 (5): 785–800. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02273.x.
  29. ↑ David DeFranza (2010-02-17). "Andaman Sea Coral May Hold the Secret to Warm Water Reef Survival". Treehugger. Retrieved 2015-02-02.
  30. ↑ "A hot survivor". The Economist. April 9, 2016. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2016-04-30.
  31. ↑ Rowan, Rob; Powers, Dennis A. (1992). "Ribosomal RNA Sequences and the Diversity of Symbiotic Dinoflagellates (Zooxanthellae)". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 89 (8): 3639–43. Bibcode:1992PNAS...89.3639R. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.8.3639. JSTOR 2359156. PMC 48924Freely accessible. PMID 1565660.
  32. ↑ Stern, Rowena F.; Horak, Ales; Andrew, Rose L.; Coffroth, Mary-Alice; Andersen, Robert A.; Küpper, Frithjof C.; Jameson, Ian; Hoppenrath, Mona; Véron, Benoît; Kasai, Fumai; Brand, Jerry; James, Erick R.; Keeling, Patrick J. (2010). "Environmental Barcoding Reveals Massive Dinoflagellate Diversity in Marine Environments". PLoS ONE. 5 (11): e13991. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...513991S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013991. PMC 2981561Freely accessible. PMID 21085582.
  33. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Trench, Robert K.; Blank, Rudolf J. (1987). "Symbiodinium Microadriaticum Freudenthal, S. Goreauii Sp. Nov., S. Kawagutii Sp. Nov. And S. Pilosum Sp. Nov.: Gymnodinioid Dinoflagellate Symbionts of Marine Invertebrates". Journal of Phycology. 23 (3): 469–81. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.1987.tb02534.x.
  34. 1 2 Sampayo, E. M.; Dove, S.; Lajeunesse, T. C. (2009). "Cohesive molecular genetic data delineate species diversity in the dinoflagellate genus Symbiodinium". Molecular Ecology. 18 (3): 500–19. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04037.x. PMID 19161470.
  35. 1 2 3 Lajeunesse, Todd C.; Thornhill, Daniel J. (2011). "Improved Resolution of Reef-Coral Endosymbiont (Symbiodinium) Species Diversity, Ecology, and Evolution through psbA Non-Coding Region Genotyping". PLoS ONE. 6 (12): e29013. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...629013L. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029013. PMC 3247227Freely accessible. PMID 22216157.
  36. 1 2 Santos, S. R.; Shearer, T. L.; Hannes, A. R.; Coffroth, M. A. (2004). "Fine-scale diversity and specificity in the most prevalent lineage of symbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodinium, Dinophyceae) of the Caribbean". Molecular Ecology. 13 (2): 459–69. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02058.x. PMID 14717900.
  37. ↑ Finney, J. Christine; Pettay, Daniel Tye; Sampayo, Eugenia M.; Warner, Mark E.; Oxenford, Hazel A.; Lajeunesse, Todd C. (2010). "The Relative Significance of Host–Habitat, Depth, and Geography on the Ecology, Endemism, and Speciation of Coral Endosymbionts in the Genus Symbiodinium". Microbial Ecology. 60 (1): 250–63. doi:10.1007/s00248-010-9681-y. JSTOR 40802290. PMID 20502891.
  38. ↑ De Queiroz, Kevin (2007). "Species Concepts and Species Delimitation". Systematic Biology. 56 (6): 879–86. doi:10.1080/10635150701701083. PMID 18027281.
  39. ↑ Thornhill, Daniel J.; Lajeunesse, Todd C.; Santos, Scott R. (2007). "Measuring rDNA diversity in eukaryotic microbial systems: How intragenomic variation, pseudogenes, and PCR artifacts confound biodiversity estimates". Molecular Ecology. 16 (24): 5326–40. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03576.x. PMID 17995924.
  40. ↑ Pochon, X.; Garcia-Cuetos, L.; Baker, A. C.; Castella, E.; Pawlowski, J. (2007). "One-year survey of a single Micronesian reef reveals extraordinarily rich diversity of Symbiodinium types in soritid foraminifera". Coral Reefs. 26 (4): 867–82. Bibcode:2007CorRe..26..867P. doi:10.1007/s00338-007-0279-x.
  41. 1 2 3 Reimer, James Davis; Shah, Md Mahfuzur Rahman; Sinniger, Frederic; Yanagi, Kensuke; Suda, Shoichiro (2010). "Preliminary analyses of cultured Symbiodinium isolated from sand in the oceanic Ogasawara Islands, Japan". Marine Biodiversity. 40 (4): 237–47. doi:10.1007/s12526-010-0044-1.
  42. ↑ Andras, Jason P.; Kirk, Nathan L.; Drew Harvell, C. (2011). "Range-wide population genetic structure of Symbiodinium associated with the Caribbean Sea fan coral, Gorgonia ventalina". Molecular Ecology. 20 (12): 2525–42. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05115.x. PMID 21545573.
  43. 1 2 Pettay, Daniel T.; Wham, Drew C.; Pinzón, Jorge H.; Lajeunesse, Todd C. (2011). "Genotypic diversity and spatial-temporal distribution of Symbiodinium clones in an abundant reef coral". Molecular Ecology. 20 (24): 5197–212. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05357.x. PMID 22082053.
  44. 1 2 3 LaJeunesse, T. (2002). "Diversity and community structure of symbiotic dinoflagellates from Caribbean coral reefs". Marine Biology. 141 (2): 387–400. doi:10.1007/s00227-002-0829-2.
  45. ↑ Rowan, Rob; Knowlton, Nancy; Baker, Andrew; Jara, Javier (1997). "Landscape ecology of algal symbionts creates variation in episodes of coral bleaching". Nature. 388 (6639): 265–9. Bibcode:1997Natur.388..265R. doi:10.1038/40843. PMID 9230434.
  46. ↑ Toller, W. W.; Rowan, R; Knowlton, N (2001). "Repopulation of Zooxanthellae in the Caribbean corals Montastraea annularis and M. Faveolata following experimental and disease-associated bleaching". The Biological bulletin. 201 (3): 360–73. doi:10.2307/1543614. JSTOR 1543614. PMID 11751248.
  47. 1 2 Thornhill, Daniel J.; LaJeunesse, Todd C.; Kemp, Dustin W.; Fitt, William K.; Schmidt, Gregory W. (2005). "Multi-year, seasonal genotypic surveys of coral-algal symbioses reveal prevalent stability or post-bleaching reversion". Marine Biology. 148 (4): 711–22. doi:10.1007/s00227-005-0114-2.
  48. ↑ Coffroth, Mary Alice; Santos, Scott R.; Goulet, Tamar L. (2001). "Early ontogenetic expression of specificity in a cnidarian-algal symbiosis" (PDF). Marine Ecology Progress Series. 222: 85–96. doi:10.3354/meps222085.
  49. 1 2 Porto, Isabel; Granados, Camila; Restrepo, Juan C.; Sánchez, Juan A. (2008). "Macroalgal-Associated Dinoflagellates Belonging to the Genus Symbiodinium in Caribbean Reefs". PLoS ONE. 3 (5): e2160. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.2160P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002160. PMC 2364641Freely accessible. PMID 18478069.
  50. ↑ Coffroth, Mary Alice; Lewis, Cynthia F.; Santos, Scott R.; Weaver, Jessica L. (2006). "Environmental populations of symbiotic dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium can initiate symbioses with reef cnidarians". Current Biology. 16 (23): R985–7. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.049. PMID 17141602.
  51. ↑ Manning, Mackenzie M.; Gates, Ruth D. (2008). "Diversity in populations of free-living Symbiodinium from a Caribbean and Pacific reef". Limnology and Oceanography. 53 (5): 1853–61. doi:10.4319/lo.2008.53.5.1853.
  52. ↑ Schoenberg, D. A.; Trench, R. K. (1980). "Genetic Variation in Symbiodinium (=Gymnodinium) microadriaticum Freudenthal, and Specificity in its Symbiosis with Marine Invertebrates. I. Isoenzyme and Soluble Protein Patterns of Axenic Cultures of Symbiodinium microadriaticum". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 207 (1169): 405–27. Bibcode:1980RSPSB.207..405S. doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0031. JSTOR 35362.
  53. ↑ Schoenberg, D. A.; Trench, R. K. (1980). "Genetic Variation in Symbiodinium (=Gymnodinium) microadriaticum Freudenthal, and Specificity in its Symbiosis with Marine Invertebrates. II. Morphological Variation in Symbiodinium microadriaticum". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 207 (1169): 429–44. Bibcode:1980RSPSB.207..429S. doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0032. JSTOR 35363.
  54. ↑ Schoenberg, D. A.; Trench, R. K. (1980). "Genetic Variation in Symbiodinium (=Gymnodinium) microadriaticum Freudenthal, and Specificity in its Symbiosis with Marine Invertebrates. III. Specificity and Infectivity of Symbiodinium microadriaticum". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 207 (1169): 445–60. Bibcode:1980RSPSB.207..445S. doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0033. JSTOR 35364.
  55. ↑ Santos, Scott R.; Taylor, Derek J.; Coffroth, Mary Alice (2001). "Genetic Comparisons of Freshly Isolated Versus Cultured Symbiotic Dinoflagellates: Implications for Extrapolating to the Intact Symbiosis". Journal of Phycology. 37 (5): 900–12. doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.00194.x.
  56. ↑ Goulet, T.; Coffroth, M. (February 2003). "Genetic composition of zooxanthellae between and within colonies of the octocoral Plexaura kuna, based on small subunit rDNA and multilocus DNA fingerprinting". Marine Biology. 142 (2): 233–9. doi:10.1007/s00227-002-0936-0. Retrieved 8 August 2016.
  57. 1 2 3 Fitt, W. K.; Trench, R. K. (1983). "The Relation of Diel Patterns of Cell Division to Diel Patterns of Motility in the Symbiotic Dinoflagellate Symbiodinium Microadria Ticum Freudenthal in Culture". New Phytologist. 94 (3): 421–32. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1983.tb03456.x. JSTOR 2432757.
  58. ↑ Baillie, B. K.; Belda-Baillie, C. A.; Silvestre, V.; Sison, M.; Gomez, A. V.; Gomez, E. D.; Monje, V. (2000). "Genetic variation in Symbiodinium isolates from giant clams based on random-amplified-polymorphic DNA (RAPD) patterns". Marine Biology. 136 (5): 829–36. doi:10.1007/s002270000290.
  59. ↑ Lajeunesse, Todd C. (2001). "Investigating the Biodiversity, Ecology, and Phylogeny of Endosymbiotic Dinoflagellates in the Genus Symbiodinium Using the Its Region: In Search of A 'species' Level Marker". Journal of Phycology. 37 (5): 866–80. doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.01031.x.
  60. 1 2 3 Freudenthal, Hugo D. (1962). "Symbiodinium gen. Nov. And Symbiodinium microadriaticum sp. nov., a Zooxanthella: Taxonomy, Life Cycle, and Morphology". The Journal of Protozoology. 9 (1): 45–52. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1962.tb02579.x.
  61. ↑ Taylor, FJR (1987). "Dinoflagellate morphology". In Taylor, F. J. R. The Biology of Dinoflagellates. Botanical Monographs, vol. 21. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. pp. 24–91. ISBN 978-0-632-00915-2.
  62. ↑ Dodge, JD; Greuet, C (1987). "Dinoflagellate ultrastructure and complex organelles". In Taylor, F. J. R. The Biology of Dinoflagellates. Botanical Monographs, vol. 21. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. pp. 92–142. ISBN 978-0-632-00915-2.
  63. ↑ Lee, Edward Lee (2008). Phycology (4th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-46987-6.
  64. ↑ Markell, DA; Trench, RK; Iglesias-Prieto, R (1992). "Macromolecules associated with the cell-walls of symbiotic dinoflagellates". Symbiosis. 12 (1): 19–31. INIST:5092729.
  65. ↑ Wakefield, Timothy S.; Farmer, Mark A.; Kempf, Stephen C. (August 2000). "Revised description of the fine structure of in situ 'zooxanthellae' genus Symbiodinium". The Biological Bulletin. 199 (1): 76–84. JSTOR 1542709. PMID 10975645.
  66. ↑ Trench, RK; Winsor, H (1987). "Symbiosis with dinoflagellates in two pelagic flatworms, Amphiscolops sp. and Haplodiscus sp". Symbiosis. 3 (1): 1–21. INIST:8265704.
  67. ↑ Banaszak, Anastazia T.; Iglestas-Prieto, Roberto; Trench, Robert K. (1993). "Scrippsiella velellae sp. nov. (Peridiniales) and Gloeokinium viscum sp. nov. (Phytodiniales), Dinoflagellate Symbionts of Two Hydrozoans (Cnidiaria)". Journal of Phycology. 29 (4): 517–28. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.1993.tb00153.x.
  68. ↑ Díaz-Almeyda, E.; Thomé, P. E.; El Hafidi, M.; Iglesias-Prieto, R. (2011). "Differential stability of photosynthetic membranes and fatty acid composition at elevated temperature in Symbiodinium". Coral Reefs. 30 (1): 217–25. Bibcode:2011CorRe..30..217D. doi:10.1007/s00338-010-0691-5.
  69. ↑ Iglesias-Prieto, R.; Govind, N. S.; Trench, R. K. (1991). "Apoprotein Composition and Spectroscopic Characterization of the Water-Soluble Peridinin–Chlorophyll a–Proteins from Three Symbiotic Dinoflagellates". Proceedings: Biological Sciences. 246 (1317): 275–83. Bibcode:1991RSPSB.246..275I. doi:10.1098/rspb.1991.0155. JSTOR 76745.
  70. ↑ Iglesias-Prieto, R.; Govind, N. S.; Trench, R. K. (1993). "Isolation and Characterization of Three Membrane-Bound Chlorophyll-Protein Complexes from Four Dinoflagellate Species". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 340 (1294): 381–92. doi:10.1098/rstb.1993.0080. JSTOR 3030171.
  71. ↑ Rowan, Rob; Whitney, Spencer M.; Fowler, Amanda; Yellowlees, David (1996). "Rubisco in marine symbiotic dinoflagellates: Form II enzymes in eukaryotic oxygenic phototrophs encoded by a nuclear multigene family". The Plant Cell Online. 8 (3): 539–53. doi:10.1105/tpc.8.3.539. JSTOR 3870331. PMC 161119Freely accessible. PMID 8721755.
  72. ↑ Hennige, S. J.; Suggett, D. J.; Warner, M. E.; McDougall, K. E.; Smith, D. J. (2009). "Photobiology of Symbiodinium revisited: Bio-physical and bio-optical signatures". Coral Reefs. 28 (1): 179–95. Bibcode:2009CorRe..28..179H. doi:10.1007/s00338-008-0444-x.
  73. ↑ Iglesias-Prieto, Roberto; Trench, Robert K. (1994). "Acclimation and adaptation to irradiance in symbiotic dinoflagellates. I. Responses of the photosynthetic unit to changes in photon flux density" (PDF). Marine Ecology Progress Series. 113 (1): 163–75. doi:10.3354/meps113163.
  74. ↑ Iglesias-Prieto, R.; Trench, R. K. (1997). "Acclimation and adaptation to irradiance in symbiotic dinoflagellates. II. Response of chlorophyll-protein complexes to different photon-flux densities". Marine Biology. 130 (1): 23–33. doi:10.1007/s002270050221.
  75. 1 2 Blank, Rudolf J.; Trench, Robert K. (1985). "Speciation and Symbiotic Dinoflagellates". Science. 229 (4714): 656–8. Bibcode:1985Sci...229..656B. doi:10.1126/science.229.4714.656. PMID 17739379.
  76. ↑ Santos, Scott R.; Coffroth, Mary Alice (February 2003). "Molecular genetic evidence that dinoflagellates belonging to the genus Symbiodinium freudenthal are haploid". The Biological Bulletin. 204 (1): 10–20. JSTOR 1543491. PMID 12588740.
  77. ↑ Trench, R. K. (1974). "Nutritional potentials in Zoanthus sociathus (Coelenterata, Anthozoa)". Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen. 26 (2): 174–216. Bibcode:1974HWM....26..174T. doi:10.1007/BF01611382.
  78. ↑ Algal species helps corals survive in Earth's hottest reefs
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/12/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.